harmony wrote:BrianH wrote:Your (or anyone's) opinion of the success of Evangelical Christianity is totally Irrelevant to the topic here. If you ar going to participate in this thread, I request that you refrain from generating irrelevant tangents that do not address the issue I have raised.
Thank you
-BH
.
The Evangelical position as it relates to the Mormon position, since you are Evangelical and I am Mormon, is indeed part of the topic of this thread. Unless you can't defend against threats to your own religion?
Incorrect. No one's "position" is relevant unless they are addressing the specific challenge I have issued to you. Niether your religion nor my religion are not the topic here. You may be Mormon and I may be a Christian, but that does not mean that you are going to be able to address the topic by doing the typical "Mormon thing" and trying to AVOID the specific topic I have raised by retreating behind the usual accusations, rabbit trails, smoke screen and evasion tactics so typical of LDS apologetics.
I remind you to simply R E A D the OP and see for yourself that the topic here is the LDS claim that Smtih translated the Book of Abraham correctly and in particular that he identified the canopic jars of Facsimile #1 correctly, i.e. as " Elkenah, Libnah, Mahmackrah and Korash".
I understand why you would want to avoid that topic and try to side-step it by challenging biblical Christianity instead. But that is not the subject here, nor will I allow you to change the subject.
Please either address the specific challenge I have issued in the OP or ...take your evasions somewhere else and get lost.
You have a choice. You will now either SHOW US some actual reasons to think that these Egyptian deities identified by your so-called "prophet" REALLY ARE "Elkenah, Libnah, Mahmackrah and Korash" or else you will once again try to avoid the topic.
I am betting you choose door number 2.
-BH
.