Tarski wrote:As soon as it is clear to a majority of disinterested parties that there really is a measurable phenomenon in the light of day so to speak, then we will set about explaining it. As it stands, it is just what one would expect given the frailties of human imagination and perception.
The fringe scientists and ghost hunters are free to build ghost busting machines all they like and if every stray heat signature or bit of static electricity tickles their home made instruments and imaginations then fine too.
Well, Tarski, it's like this: Virtually every "paranormal investigator" started out as a skeptic, including Raymond Moody, who is widely credited with kicking off NDE studies in the late 70s. He was initially not a believer, until he began correlating what he was hearing over and over. So, in fact, he was initially a "disinterested party", who later became convinced that there was something to the phenomenon.
I have no "final verdict" about NDEs one way or the other, either, though I think there is substantial evidence in favour of life after death, as you noted elsewhere, though, not necessarily patterned on Mormon doctrine. I even doubt there will be a resurrection, for example, but that our "spirit essence" (I suppose what Joseph Smith termed "intelligences"), if you like, will continue.
But really, ultimately, it's no skin off my nose (pardon the pun) if we're "dead forever", because we wouldn't even know we once existed.
Wretched, ephemeral race, children of chance and tribulation, why do you force me to tell you the very thing which it would be most profitable for you not to hear? The very best thing is utterly beyond your reach: not to have been born, not to be, to be nothing. However, the second best thing for you is: to die soon. - Aristotle