That becomes more and more difficult since they seem to be dead set on promoting discussions where their personal opinions appear to win out. This means in other threads they'll rationalize whatever excuse they want to ban someone, and when they don't even have to explain their reasons of even announce that someone has "left the building" via coercion, then this means they can abuse their privilege all the while pretending to be interested in open discussion. DCP clearly doesn't know what he is talking about and what we are seeing is just astounding. Internet Mormons everywhere are coming together and letting the apologetic front determine policy. They're treating these apologetic explanations as doctrine and dismissing the real doctrine as folklore! If you pay close attention to what the Church has said, even in its recent release, there is nothing in it that says Bott was wrong in his speculation. All it says is that it was his speculation that the Church isn't obligated to accept as doctrine. But listening to LDS members whine about this, you'd think the Church fully supports their attacks on Bott. Well, it doesn't.
What I find interesting is that some of them in times past have been dead set opposed to the Church's stance on doctrine which was summarized in the Newsroom in 2007 (Approaching Mormon Doctrine). I've argued the Church's stance since decades before that. But now these same people are diving headlong into it and are treating two Newsroom articles as the absolute word of God. Of course I agree that the statements are official doctrine and I agree with every word of them. Though of course, I don't interpret more into them than is already there like they do.
The height of irony (and hypocrisy).