huckelberry wrote:"walking porn"
That is a disgusting phrase. I cannot understand why it would ever get used under any but the most outlandish of circumstances.
No not even under outlandish circumstances.
I think it should not be used.
Quite right because it once again it transfers the responsibility for a mans sexual desires on women. But this has always been the mindset of Mormon leaders - and pretty much most of other religious leaders as well.
Women are NOT at fault for anything. A woman always has the right to choose anything she wants no matter what. And she is NOT a slut or walking pornography for it. I hope that some day women will be treated as 100% equals like they are, without religious old "F"s like Mormon GA's getting in the way.
I was pretty outraged when it came out. So it just makes me frown on Mormon Cult Leaders who use a beautiful, skinny, tanned, long legged brunette in their commercials to get people to come shop at their mall - paid for with money that originally all came from tithing.
Meanwhile, humanitarian aid? Yeah, whatever world. Come look at our million dollar squirter - er - Las Vegas style water thingy.
If these men, this corporation, this CULT was actually spending money, in the billions of dollars - on humanitarian aid, it would be different. But they aren't. They're building stupid edifices to themselves to bring in the most amount of cash return.
Look at how Mormonism has evolved. From the earliest roots down to today. If you never believed it was a full corporation disguised as a church - you should now.
How they can stand in front of their so-called 14 million members - and ask for continued tithing - is beyond me.
