Polygamy-Porter wrote:Tobin wrote:I'm surprised Holland wasn't better prepared to deal with the questions he was asked. Honestly, Joseph Smith didn't know Egyptian nor could he read and translate it. Holland and company should just acknowledge that. If the Book of Abraham is true, it must be an origin story and could not possibly have come from translating any Egyptian papyrus.
No no no, he did answer the question.
Listen to this beginning of Holland's string of lies.
"All I'm saying, all I'm saaa, all I'm saying, is that what got translated, got translated into the word of god.."
Sounds a bit like missing papyrus theory....
Yes, and that is just as stupid. The papyrus recovered was not old enough to have been written by the hand of Abraham (nor could it have been). I wish these men were interested in the truth instead of sticking their collective heads in the sand.