Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Molok »

Hoops wrote:
Molok wrote:As an atheist who is also an artist, I find this thread somewhat amusing and more than a little sad.

Why?

Because you love Jesus and that infuriates me. No, just some of the opinions on art were a little disheartening.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Hoops »

Molok wrote:Because you love Jesus and that infuriates me. No, just some of the opinions on art were a little disheartening.

I would way way way much rather see what you have to tell us about art. Please go ahead.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Molok »

Hoops wrote:
Molok wrote:As an atheist who is also an artist, I find this thread somewhat amusing and more than a little sad.

Feel free to answer Shades' question, as I'm sure you would answer it much better than I.

The question of art being easier to explain than science? Art has no rules and multiple meanings sometimes layered in one piece. I mean I suppose I could explain the Mona Lisa as a picture of a lady with half a smile, but that wouldn't help you understand it any better.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Hoops »

Molok wrote:The question of art being easier to explain than science? Art has no rules and multiple meanings sometimes layered in one piece. I mean I suppose I could explain the Mona Lisa as a picture of a lady with half a smile, but that wouldn't help you understand it any better.

I don't think it's me that you need to convince, it's your fellow aah. But I understand... since they're part of the aah brethren you don't dare show them how wrong they are.

Plus, we have the additional tactic of waiting for me to explain how I see art and then slamming my fingers in the atheist car door. It's all just so utterly predictable.

The evidence just keeps stacking upon itself.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Molok »

Hoops wrote:
Plus, we have the additional tactic of waiting for me to explain how I see art and then slamming my fingers in the atheist car door. It's all just so utterly predictable.

The evidence just keeps stacking upon itself.

is this what you think Im doing or are you referring to other people on the thread?
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Buffalo »

Hoops wrote:I don't think it's me that you need to convince, it's your fellow aah. But I understand... since they're part of the aah brethren you don't dare show them how wrong they are.

Plus, we have the additional tactic of waiting for me to explain how I see art and then slamming my fingers in the atheist car door. It's all just so utterly predictable.

The evidence just keeps stacking upon itself.


Exhibit B
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Once again: How does art prove the existence of God?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Dantana
_Emeritus
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:53 pm

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Dantana »

Dr. Shades wrote:Once again: How does art prove the existence of God?


Maybe because it indicates sentience?

That there doesn't appear to be any explanation for sentience to develop in strictly evolutionary cosmology. The organism does not gain an advantage by being self aware. Why are we not simply zombies?

Even if it is advantageous to the organism to be self aware, it seems to me the anguish/fear of death and the unknown, would cause this mutant to kill itself, or worse....develop religion :wink:
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Buffalo »

tana wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:Once again: How does art prove the existence of God?


Maybe because it indicates sentience?

That there doesn't appear to be any explanation for sentience to develop in strictly evolutionary cosmology. The organism does not gain an advantage by being self aware. Why are we not simply zombies?

Even if it is advantageous to the organism to be self aware, it seems to me the anguish/fear of death and the unknown, would cause this mutant to kill itself, or worse....develop religion :wink:


I would answer that you can't have high intelligence without sentience, and high intelligence is clearly an evolutionary advantage.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Hoops Has Turned Agnostic/Atheist

Post by _Hoops »

Dr. Shades wrote:Once again: How does art prove the existence of God?

It doesn't.
Post Reply