Shades, its time to restore the thread

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _RockSlider »

Nortinski wrote:Now, with that out of the way, the answer is "No." Why? Because I said so.

Gee shades' apparently the powers to be, here ... have spoken

Care to explain just why you would have gotten into this "agreement" with this type of individual in the first place? You once mentioned that it was because of protecting him from physical threats, but he obviously has zero interest in backing down from this and continues to advertise his intentions over multiple public forums.

His continuing to show control/power over you and this board in this manner continues to mock the standards of this board and makes a fool out of you for giving this Nort special privileges/status on the board.

Nort now claims you are not even friends, and yet controls you like a puppet.
_Nortinski
_Emeritus
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:38 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Nortinski »

RockSlider wrote:
Nortinski wrote:Now, with that out of the way, the answer is "No." Why? Because I said so.

Gee shades' apparently the powers to be, here ... have spoken

Care to explain just why you would have gotten into this "agreement" with this type of individual in the first place? You once mentioned that it was because of protecting him from physical threats, but he obviously has zero interest in backing down from this and continues to advertise his intentions over multiple public forums.

His continuing to show control/power over you and this board in this manner continues to mock the standards of this board and makes a fool out of you for giving this Nort special privileges/status on the board.

Nort now claims you are not even friends, and yet controls you like a puppet.



Ha. I said we are not "close friends." We ARE friends. I just don't know his address or home phone number.

As for me controlling him "like a puppet", well that's just funny. Just curious, do you actually think your sad attempt to use your Psychology 101 text book is going to get Shade's to respond with, "Yeah! RockSlider is right! Nort is playing me for a fool! I'll show that I'm no fool." and then re-post the thread?

This "project" is far bigger than you could imagine, RockSlider. I could be lying about everything or nothing at all. There could be 1 of us in the "temple committee" or 100 of us. We could have a General Authority on our team or it's just me and a homeless guy that sits outside of Temple Square.

And it's just killing you that YOU are the one who seems to have no control over what YOU want with this "old thread" issue.

It's quite amusing. And I suspect Shades thinks so too. I dunno, I don't have his phone number so I can't call and ask him. ;-)
The truth is a lot easier to see when you stop assuming you already have it. - Me
_RockSlider
_Emeritus
Posts: 6752
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:02 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _RockSlider »

Nortinski wrote:Ha. I said we are not "close friends." We ARE friends. I just don't know his address or home phone number.
As for me controlling him "like a puppet", well that's just funny. Just curious, do you actually think your sad attempt to use your Psychology 101 text book is going to get Shades's to respond with, "Yeah! RockSlider is right! Nort is playing me for a fool! I'll show that I'm no fool." and then re-post the thread?


Actually Nort, based on the only other break in standard operating procedure here at MDB which I have observed in over three years of regular activity here (the perma banning of Jersey Girl), it was my impression that Shades dug his heels in and let personal animosity drive a personally biased, bad decision. I assumed he would dig in his heels again with this strange (for this site) moderating decision and what also appears to be some personal bias.

This "project" is far bigger than you could imagine, RockSlider. I could be lying about everything or nothing at all. There could be 1 of us in the "temple committee" or 100 of us. We could have a General Authority on our team or it's just me and a homeless guy that sits outside of Temple Square.


What you don’t get Nort, is that I don’t give a crap about you or your committee. It seems I'm not alone in this. Your self aggrandizement will soon enough come to an end. You are no-body, and threaten no-body, and as you should have seen already with the tapes you have released … no one cares.

And it's just killing you that YOU are the one who seems to have no control over what YOU want with this "old thread" issue.
It's quite amusing. And I suspect Shades thinks so too. I dunno, I don't have his phone number so I can't call and ask him. ;-)


I somehow doubt that Shades thinks this is funny. The whole reason this board exists and is popular today is because of what Shades worked very hard to establish … an extremely low moderation board that encourages free speech. A board with a history of perma bans you can count on one hand, one that, until you came along, never had a thread closed or removed (other than by legal threat in my understanding).

In my mind, my wanting to have the thread returned is a matter of restoring what this board was suppose to stand for, and a desire to try and understand why Shades would have made such an unusual exception to the years of standard practice that has been establish here.

Other than that it has NOTHING to do with you or your agenda. Its a matter of principle ... something of which you obviously would not understand.
_Nortinski
_Emeritus
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:38 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Nortinski »

RockSlider wrote: You are no-body, and threaten no-body, and as you should have seen already with the tapes you have released … no one cares.



With all due respect, with over 14,000 views that have stirred up conversations on Mormon, ex-Mormon and other religious (or anti0-religious) message boards on three little videos in less than 48 hours, I wouldn't say that "no one cares." Hell, the email I've received alone (over 200 of 'em) says that SOME people DO care.

I didn't hunt for a phone number for a reporter with the Washington Post. It was sent to me via email and I called it (after verifying it was a valid number.)

As for your belief that the videos (or is it just me?) "threaten no-body" I know for a fact from my friend/mole in Church Security that it most certainly DOES threaten SOMEBODY. (Not Monson though. He apparently is suffering from dementia and it's getting worse and worse so he really doesn't know what the hell is going on.)

XOXOX...

Noah 1/7

Um...oops, I meant Nort 2/7 :rolleyes:
The truth is a lot easier to see when you stop assuming you already have it. - Me
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Infymus »

10:55 am
Newnamenoah: would also like to clarify that Nortinski doesn't have his hand up my ass.

10:56 am
Nortinski: I'll bet you would love that. Sicko.

10:57 am
Newnamenoah: Your Mom said what??? ;-)

Only Shades would know the real truth on the IPs. Your timestamps suck.

Whatever. I see that Jeff Ricks on PM is also trying to distance himself from you. RFM has already banned you. I won't tolerate it either on the EMF.

(bamboom): If you had video material which clearly showed - not vaguely, not ostensibly, not 'maybe', but undeniably, clearly and shockingly showed - the Republican nominee for US President engaged in 19th century witchy-poo ceremonies in a Mormon temple, mumbling arcane nonsense, you would destroy his presidency, if his own financial malfeasance hasn't already. I promise you. Footage of that kind would be the nail in the coffine of Bain-Caymen etc.

That kind of material would be so volatile that any professional person would know how to handle it. The last thing they would do is take to a public blog bragging that they had this material, alluding to conversations with the 'secret service' and promising that closer to November it would all be revealed.

Either you don't have this material, in which case you're a liar or mired in self-deception, or you do have it, in which case you're an incredibly naïve and stupid person for advertising it on this site.


Yep. Exactly. I'm bowing out of this. We'll see where the dust falls later.
_Nortinski
_Emeritus
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:38 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Nortinski »

Infymus wrote:
Whatever. I see that Jeff Ricks on PM is also trying to distance himself from you. RFM has already banned you. I won't tolerate it either on the EMF.



Is it bad that I have no clue what "the EMF" is? :rolleyes:

Jeff Ricks is a good guy who is just very protective of his site and has engaged in a very healthy conversation re: his concerns. As for RfM, they banned me because years ago I was openly providing temple recommends to Mormons "on the edge" who wanted to see their child get married in a temple but they couldn't afford to be worthy enough to buy a recommend from their cult leadership.

I am VERY proud to have helped numerous people see their own child get married and if that sort of thing gets me banned for life, I'll wear it as a badge of honor. The moderator and the owner of RfM sent me one or two private emails and would not engage me in public on their board as to the reasons for my ban. I think they still allow the cult to instill fear in them. I do not.

Nort

PS: Okay, now I'm a bit curious. What is "the EMF"?
The truth is a lot easier to see when you stop assuming you already have it. - Me
_Nortinski
_Emeritus
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:38 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Nortinski »

Infymus wrote:10:55 am
Newnamenoah: would also like to clarify that Nortinski doesn't have his hand up my ass.

10:56 am
Nortinski: I'll bet you would love that. Sicko.

10:57 am
Newnamenoah: Your Mom said what??? ;-)

Only Shades would know the real truth on the IPs. Your timestamps suck.



I think that asshat "Noah" is stalking me. Who do I report him to? :lol:
The truth is a lot easier to see when you stop assuming you already have it. - Me
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Shulem »

RockSlider wrote:The original thread that was removed was in the Terrestrial forum, correct?

I'm tried of only seeing Nort in the telestial where I have to put up with Paul's filth, like it or not, if I want to respond to Nort.

I'm asking the moderators to restore the original thread, and moderate it as needed to keep it terrestrial.

I just don't get you Shades. I'm losing more and more respect for you daily over this issue ... what gives?

edit:
in case you are unwilling to bring back the original thread, I've brought up a couple posts from the depths and ask that this remains terrestrial


Quit your bitching and leave Shades the hell alone. Let him manage his Goddamn board as he sees fit. Your request has been denied so shut the hell up. Thanks.

:mad:

Paul O
_Yoda

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Yoda »

Nortinski wrote:
Infymus wrote:
Whatever. I see that Jeff Ricks on PM is also trying to distance himself from you. RFM has already banned you. I won't tolerate it either on the EMF.



Is it bad that I have no clue what "the EMF" is? :rolleyes:

Jeff Ricks is a good guy who is just very protective of his site and has engaged in a very healthy conversation re: his concerns. As for RfM, they banned me because years ago I was openly providing temple recommends to Mormons "on the edge" who wanted to see their child get married in a temple but they couldn't afford to be worthy enough to buy a recommend from their cult leadership.

I am VERY proud to have helped numerous people see their own child get married and if that sort of thing gets me banned for life, I'll wear it as a badge of honor. The moderator and the owner of RfM sent me one or two private emails and would not engage me in public on their board as to the reasons for my ban. I think they still allow the cult to instill fear in them. I do not.

Nort

PS: Okay, now I'm a bit curious. What is "the EMF"?

EMF is Infy's website, Ex-Mormon Forum. It is the message board for his larger site, The Mormon Curtain.

Nort, I'm curious. Did you advertise on RfM that you would provide folks with these temple recommends, or did they just ban you because they knew you were doing it pivately?
_Nortinski
_Emeritus
Posts: 205
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:38 am

Re: Shades, its time to restore the thread

Post by _Nortinski »

liz3564 wrote:
Nort, I'm curious. Did you advertise on RfM that you would provide folks with these temple recommends, or did they just ban you because they knew you were doing it pivately?


I'm 99% sure I never advertised it on RfM. I did, however, mention that I myself went to the temple after leaving the cult a few times.
The truth is a lot easier to see when you stop assuming you already have it. - Me
Post Reply