liz3564 wrote:True. However, I think that as a website owner myself, my constructive criticism of the situation is fair game.
RockSlider wrote:
Jersey Girl would not hurt a fly, you know it as well as anyone here that really knows Jersey Girl. She was never a legal threat to you personally or the board. I call B.S. and see it as a personal bias issue ... but what ever.
I would also like to note that Stem got beat up big time about posting his in real life information and got no such relief from you or any of the mods as he was being brutally attacked with it and asking for some help/compassion. But whatever, once again your bias is showing.
RayAgostini wrote:She's no threat at all, Shades. Never was, and never will be. Those who know her best, know that, and two of your moderators here are close friends of hers. They never felt threatened. Do you seriously think she had the time, money, or even will, to pursue this full on into a court? In the past year, she has suffered enough with a death in the family, and the ensuing turmoil and heartbreak that accompanied it. She even blogged about it here. You've misread her motives, and even what she said, which implied no direct threat to you, your family, or your livelihood.
Do you think she'd take any joy in seeing you or your family threatened? All she wanted was to have Evenson removed from the board, because of his "history", and because she felt personally threatened by him, on account of the way he acted in regard to her and a few others in wanting to identify them in real life. And he is a known stalker and predator who was exposed by the Tanners over 20 years ago.
You seriously need to rethink this, and get a better perspective.
LDSToronto wrote:RayAgostini wrote:She's no threat at all, Shades. Never was, and never will be. Those who know her best, know that, and two of your moderators here are close friends of hers. They never felt threatened. Do you seriously think she had the time, money, or even will, to pursue this full on into a court? In the past year, she has suffered enough with a death in the family, and the ensuing turmoil and heartbreak that accompanied it. She even blogged about it here. You've misread her motives, and even what she said, which implied no direct threat to you, your family, or your livelihood.
Do you think she'd take any joy in seeing you or your family threatened? All she wanted was to have Evenson removed from the board, because of his "history", and because she felt personally threatened by him, on account of the way he acted in regard to her and a few others in wanting to identify them in real life. And he is a known stalker and predator who was exposed by the Tanners over 20 years ago.
You seriously need to rethink this, and get a better perspective.
"Is there no help for Hoboken's daughter?"
Maybe Jersey Girl can be the martyr that all you New Order Mo's are looking for, your own personal Joseph falling from the window, like a lamb to the slaughter.
Hell, you could start a church - you've got your revisionist history down pat, afterall.
H.
liz3564 wrote:Sometimes, you really are an ass.
Now, are we all completely clear on this issue? Can we finally say we understand how Jersey Girl's legal threat was in a class altogether by itself?
Alter Idem wrote:If you had any sense of decency you would either stop talking about her and what YOU claim she did and stop making excuses for why you took the action you did, OR you would let her post here and defend herself against YOUR ACCUSATIONS!!
LDSToronto wrote: I support JGs ban.
H.
Stormy Waters wrote:Alter Idem wrote:If you had any sense of decency you would either stop talking about her and what YOU claim she did and stop making excuses for why you took the action you did, OR you would let her post here and defend herself against YOUR ACCUSATIONS!!
Others continue to speak up for Jersey Girl and criticize Shades for his decision. How is it unreasonable for Shades to respond to their criticism? If no one was brining it up, he probably wouldn't say anything.
Alter Idem wrote:Now, are we all completely clear on this issue? Can we finally say we understand how Jersey Girl's legal threat was in a class altogether by itself?
No, we cannot.
Reading your explanation is infuriating. You've banned Jersey Girl and yet you still insist on publishing your defensive, twisted rationalizations so I am speaking up. Rockslider, Ray and I have to speak up because she cannot.
In this situation, you are once again AS BAD as the mods at MADB because you talk about people(Jersey Girl) who can't defend themselves. You've BANNED her and she is powerless to challenge your version of events.
When mods at MADB did that to banned posters, you created this board so they'd have a way to speak out. I know, I was around back then and I remember. I even applauded your actions. But now you and your ilk do the same thing to Jersey Girl. And any of you who've attacked MADB for this kind of garbage but applaud Shades for it are as Hypocritical as he is.
If you had any sense of decency you would either stop talking about her and what YOU claim she did and stop making excuses for why you took the action you did, OR you would let her post here and defend herself against YOUR ACCUSATIONS!!