Here, let's have Ludd put Fratello Schyrver's comment in context.
Here is the thread:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5519&p=136267&hilit=kitchen#p136267In a thread about Lamanites and the genetics of Native Americans, William Schryver said this to Liz, after she failed to be convinced by certain of his assertions:
Go away, Lizzie. This conversation is over your pretty little head. You want to moderate my comments, go right ahead. Put some bite in your bitchiness."
Then KimberlyAnn said:
What an unwarranted display of hubris! Will Schryver, I doubt anything you could come up with is over Liz's head, and I can assure you it wouldn't be over mine.
I'm going on a fifteen year old memory, but I believe you're still off by sixty or so years with Charlemagne. He may be called by some the "Father of Europe", but his progeny numbered around twenty, if I remember correctly (and I usually do), so I doubt that should be taken literally.
Also, thank you for exemplifying the sexist attributes of Mormon Priesthood holders. I enjoy pointing out the sexism inherent in Mormonism, and your above post does nothing but prove me right.
KA
Then Fratello Schryver ripostes thusly when Liz still fails to be convinced by his arguments about Father Lehi's DNA:
By the way, I know you’re sticking around simply because I told you the conversation was over “your pretty little head.”
In retrospect, I have no idea if you even have a “pretty little head.” You see, I am as handsome as my avatar suggests, but I have serious doubts that you are as good looking as your avatar would lead us believe. I’ll bet you’re a wrinkled middle-aged woman with varicose veins and more good years behind you than ahead of you. Right? ;-)
Which Liz indicates she does not appreciate:
Oh, let's not allow the fact that Will is a TBM get him off the hook that easily.
Somehow, I get the impression that Will would be a sexist, arrogant asshole in any given situation, Mormon or not.
I have little respect for someone who follows around Runtu's posts like a puppy dog, sends barely veiled threats his way, and then is in genuine wonderment when Runtu turns down his creepy invitation to lunch.
Leading to Fratello Schryver's riposte to KimberlyAnn:
I'm quite well known for my "unwarranted display of hubris."
But it's nothing my 15-year-old daughter's sharp tongue can't rip to shreds.
Charlemagne (Charles I) lived in the second half of the 8th century A.D. And I think you're right that he had about 20 children. And I'll bet we're distant cousins because we both descend from him and several of his posterity. He's back about 50 generations for me. I can go back another 25 or so from him to a Roman ruler of Gaul who died in 6 A.D.
Oh, and by the way, my "sexist attributes" are not the exclusive province of the "Mormon Priesthood holder." I'm just a normal man. Well, probably a whole lot more manly than many of the "men" I see posting on this board. Most of them have been so utterly emasculated by our oppressive modern feminazi culture that they are only a couple of testosterone molecules shy of being eunuchs.
Now get your fat ass back in the kitchen and whip up a batch of cookies before I slap you silly.
<grin>
I like you KA. I'll bet you'd look good in a tanktop, too. ;-)
And his response to Liz:
Lizzie:
I would tell you to kiss my ass, but you would enjoy it too much.
No. I am quite certain I would not. Even if you shaved first.
It is very clear from the thread that Schryver is saying that anyone who is not convinced by his unsupported assertions is stupid, and that any females who are not persuaded by his reasoning have various deficiencies related to their gender roles.
So Ludd, please inform the board:
1. In what way exactly MsJack took Schryver's statements out of context.
2. In what way exactly the above exchange is analogous to my making an obviously facetious remark to Ray in order to expose his special pleading.