The1Guy wrote:I maintain that there is no such thing as Non-fiction.
Lordamercy, I hope you don't do your own taxes.
What the...
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden ~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
The1Guy wrote:I maintain that there is no such thing as Non-fiction.
Lordamercy, I hope you don't do your own taxes.
You are trying to blur legal documents with categories of writing. Anything authored by the government (specifically Congress/President/Judiciary) has the weight of law behind it and is, therefore, different than a book written by an individual. The tax code as a written document changes constantly and is often inconsistent (like a work of fiction) but no one would call it that because it's the law and is therefore absolute (until some tax lawyers get a hold of it). You have to ask yourself who is the author and who is the reader. The reader reads and reacts to what is written and has to have a certain amount of trust and faith in the author. But, yes, there is an element of fiction in virtually everything that is written, esp. if it has any complexities to it. See if you can find the fiction in what I have just written.
The1Guy wrote:...an element of fiction (the whole story is absent)...
Awesome: a definition of fiction that is a fiction.
Thank you. You have just set the stage for my next point about fiction. The reader comes to the table with his/her own set of truths and biases based on his/her experiences and beliefs and anything coming from the writer that conflicts with them will likely be viewed as pure fiction or outright lies. The more conservative and narrow-minded the reader is the more likely he/she will label the conflicting content with pejorative terms or simply not read it, judging the content from its cover. So, the label, "Fiction" or "Non-fiction," is as much in the eye of the beholder as coming from the pen of the author.
The1Guy wrote:Thank you. You have just set the stage for my next point about fiction. The reader comes to the table with his/her own set of truths and biases based on his/her experiences and beliefs and anything coming from the writer that conflicts with them will likely be viewed as pure fiction or outright lies. The more conservative and narrow-minded the reader is the more likely he/she will label the conflicting content with pejorative terms or simply not read it, judging the content from its cover. So, the label, "Fiction" or "Non-fiction," is as much in the eye of the beholder as coming from the pen of the author.
For some reason, when I read this post I heard the voice of this guy:
The1Guy wrote:So, the label, "Fiction" or "Non-fiction," is as much in the eye of the beholder as coming from the pen of the author.
In what category would you classify "The Wizard of Oz?"
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"