3sheets2thewind wrote:So feel free to continue your unrighteous dominion knowing that you abuse your position for the vainity of your pet unrighteous philosophies. And that your pet philosophies put at risk the tax exempt status of at least the Church properties in your stake.
That is a load of baloney. He's entitled to his position and his "pet philosophies" don't put the "tax exempt status" of the church at stake. By definition, individual members, bishops and stake presidents can have their little petty opinions. I have mine. You have yours.
I don't agree with the position that one has to be a Republican to be a good member of the Church, but I did change political parties to the Republicans last year, so maybe he's right.
Yahoo Bot wrote:I don't agree with the position that one has to be a Republican to be a good member of the Church.
I'm going to email your stake president and tell him you said that.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Did I mention that my current bishop is a Democrat who is quite involved in local and state party politics. Damned heathen!
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Yahoo Bot wrote:Thanks. Actually, I'm happy not to have a church calling any more. Time to spend my days noodling over the scriptures. Or watching my Family Guy files, whichever.
Well, that's certainly a relief. I was under the impression that you had somehow been "terribly damaged".
Surprise, surprise, there is no divine mandate for the Church to discuss and portray its history accurately. --Yahoo Bot
I pray thee, sir, forgive me for the mess. And whether I shot first, I'll not confess. --Han Solo, from William Shakespeare's Star Wars
The Erotic Apologist wrote:Well, that's certainly a relief. I was under the impression that you had somehow been "terribly damaged".
I have to say that your screen name conjures up some rather horrific mental images.
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS
"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado
Yahoo Bot wrote:Thanks. Actually, I'm happy not to have a church calling any more. Time to spend my days noodling over the scriptures. Or watching my Family Guy files, whichever.
Well, that's certainly a relief. I was under the impression that you had somehow been "terribly damaged".
I would give you all the "rep points" in the world, had I them, my lovely.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
Yahoo Bot wrote:Thanks. Actually, I'm happy not to have a church calling any more. Time to spend my days noodling over the scriptures. Or watching my Family Guy files, whichever.
Well, that's certainly a relief. I was under the impression that you had somehow been "terribly damaged".
Your impression was certainly correct. I can no longer be a General Authority. That can't happen if you sit around every week with no calling.
Bob Loblaw wrote:Did I mention that my current bishop is a Democrat who is quite involved in local and state party politics. Damned heathen!
He is not your Bishop, he is only a man with no authority. He lied to whomever interviewed him for Bishop. You have no obligation to sustain that wolf in shepards clothing.
Yahoo Bot wrote: That is a load of baloney. He's entitled to his position and his "pet philosophies" don't put the "tax exempt status" of the church at stake. By definition, individual members, bishops and stake presidents can have their little petty opinions. I have mine. You have yours.
if preached from the pulpit it does.
I don't agree with the position that one has to be a Republican to be a good member of the Church, but I did change political parties to the Republicans last year, so maybe he's right.
And neither does bcspace, bcspace philosophy mingle with scripture is that any line of thinking on the left, puts one in direct opposition to God and the gospel. From bcspace postings one can gather that all persons whose any degree of political ideology is considered "left" or "liberal" is not in good standing with God or the Gospel.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
