Dr. Shades wrote:How can you be so critical of films you've never even seen?
Why do you say Blixa has never seen them?
Dr. Shades wrote:How can you be so critical of films you've never even seen?
This is where you are wrong, mon ami: we have not yet begun to exhaust the marvelous depths of things Rand.MrStakhanovite wrote:You know what doesn't merit a 5 page thread?
Ayn Rand.
MrStakhanovite wrote:You know what doesn't merit a 5 page thread?
Ayn Rand.
Bret Ripley wrote:This is where you are wrong, mon ami: we have not yet begun to exhaust the marvelous depths of things Rand.MrStakhanovite wrote:You know what doesn't merit a 5 page thread?
Ayn Rand.
For example: Ayn Rand's birth name was Alisa Rosenbaum, which is an anagram for "A biomass unreal". Or "A lesbian's amour". I'd like to see someone try that with David Hume.
MrStakhanovite wrote:You know what doesn't merit a 5 page thread?
Ayn Rand.
MrStakhanovite wrote:You know what doesn't merit a 5 page thread?
Ayn Rand.
Kishkumen wrote:MrStakhanovite wrote:You know what doesn't merit a 5 page thread?
Ayn Rand.
And yet there are countless mega-threads devoted to the likes of Will Schryver and Daniel Peterson.
EAllusion wrote:Yeah, if you aren't familiar with LeVay Satanism, which is what self-described Satanists are, it's just a variation of Ayn Rand with some gothic aesthetics and ritual. If Mormonism is compatible with Rand, then ditto for Mormonism and Satanism.
Kishkumen wrote:EAllusion wrote:Yeah, if you aren't familiar with LeVay Satanism, which is what self-described Satanists are, it's just a variation of Ayn Rand with some gothic aesthetics and ritual. If Mormonism is compatible with Rand, then ditto for Mormonism and Satanism.
I would agree that LeVay Satanism has more in common with Objectivism than Mormonism has in common with Objectivism.