Case No. 20120452 A Must READ (Links)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_The Mighty Builder
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:48 pm

Case No. 20120452 A Must READ (Links)

Post by _The Mighty Builder »

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/86256713/UTSC%2 ... 0Brief.pdf

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/86256713/UTSC%2 ... 0Brief.pdf

The reason for this posts is to simply show that the Mormon Church is in a Utah State Supreme Court case where they are afraid of the Plaintiff's claims.

Everyone who wants to understand what the Mormon Church really cherishes should read these two Briefs. Despite their VERY public claims of doing more for Sex Abuse Victims than ANY OTHER Organization, when they are being sued, they threaten to do away with the HELP LINE if the Plaintiff prevails in court. This shows their VERY VERY Corporate side and belittles their supposed Christian side. It is and always has been about the MONEY!

Therefore I removed my comments that started the distraction.
Last edited by Guest on Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:12 pm, edited 6 times in total.
_The Mighty Builder
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:48 pm

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _The Mighty Builder »

REMOVED BY TMB
Last edited by Guest on Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Yoda

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _Yoda »

The Mighty Builder wrote:I wonder how many Child Sex Abusers Romney protected?

That's a pretty outlandish statement about someone you don't even know.

Look, I know that there are bishops out there who are creeps, but there are also bishops who are good men, who are fathers, who would do anything to make sure that no harm came to a child.

Several posters on this board served as bishops, and were fantastic bishops. Jason Bourne comes to mind immediately.

I don't think it is right for you, or anyone, to make that type of blatant statement accusing someone without proof.
_Stormy Waters

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _Stormy Waters »

liz3564 wrote:I don't think it is right for you, or anyone, to make that type of blatant statement accusing someone without proof.


I agree with this. When it comes to child abuse no accusations/implications should be made without substantial evidence.
_The Mighty Builder
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:48 pm

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _The Mighty Builder »

REMOVED BY TMB
Last edited by Guest on Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Yoda

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _Yoda »

The Mighty Builder wrote:Lets see, 34% of all Boy Scout Troops are sponsored by the Mormon Church and yet only 2% of the Known Child Sex Abusers are Mormons? Sounds like a cover up to me.

That doesn't give you any right to name specific people without proof.
_The Mighty Builder
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:48 pm

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _The Mighty Builder »

REMOVED BY TMB
Last edited by Guest on Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _Themis »

The Mighty Builder wrote:Lets see, 34% of all Boy Scout Troops are sponsored by the Mormon Church and yet only 2% of the Known Child Sex Abusers are Mormons? Sounds like a cover up to me.


Possibly, but we should also take into account the church calls people to be scout masters as apposed to people volunteering.
42
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _Drifting »

liz3564 wrote:That doesn't give you any right to name specific people without proof.


Oh the irony...
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Case No. 20120452 Links OMG WOW

Post by _harmony »

Drifting wrote:
liz3564 wrote:That doesn't give you any right to name specific people without proof.


Oh the irony...


Oh, stop. That was beneath you. :redface:
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply