palerobber wrote:Quasimodo wrote:In fairness, McNaughton's painting is technically very good.
huh? the technical merit of his work is somewhere between New Era Magazine illustrator and retired BYU engineering professor. like i could see him maybe winning 2nd prize at the American Fork Steel Days art show. out of 9 entries.
I'm an illustrator myself. His technique is quite good. I always try to give the devil his due.

I have seen some of his work where the perspective of his background buildings is a bit off. As though he couldn't take enough time to get it right.
I don't consider his work art in the same way I don't consider what I create for a living art. I just draw images that sell a product or document the steps in a procedure.
His work is just trying to sell a point (a dubious one at that). Propaganda. It's a pity his talent is wasted in such banal images. Someone else mentioned Thomas Kinkade. It's a good analogy.