Dan Peterson breaks Church Rules in pursuit of Mopologetics

[_Kishkumen]

Try responding to me again, only this time without calling me stupid.

Let me get this straight: ldsfrags called you stupid?

LOL!

Uh, wow.

[_MsJack]

I'm sorry, but this Danpologetic is transparently dumb.

Not to mention that they can't seem to get their story straight.

First it's, "All Dan wanted was to prove Everybody Wang Chung was lying. He already KNEW that for certain, but he wanted proof. He wasn't going to be given any names from the directory, just a yes/no answer that he already knew was going to be 'no.'"

Now (in response to those of us who were responding to apologetic #1) it's, "Well, of course Dan had to get this information from the bishop. How else was he supposed to get Everybody Wang Chung's real name, you moron??"

If you think some anonymous nobody on a message board is doing something illegal, take your evidence to the police. If the police find merit to your claims, and they need the church's assistance in identifying someone, let them be the ones to talk to bishops and other church leaders about accessing information from their database.

[_beastie]

Are you really this dunce???

Internet connection: 40 dollars
Computer: 1000 dollars
Seeing ldsfaq calling someone "dunce": priceless

[_Kishkumen]

If you think some anonymous nobody on a message board is doing something illegal, take your evidence to the police. If the police find merit to your claims, and they need the church's assistance in identifying someone, let them be the ones to talk to bishops and other church leaders about accessing information from their database.

The whole thing makes little sense. His explanation on Liz's board was ludicrous. I mean, I get the idea that you don't want to endure the discomfort of having someone harass you when you lead your tour, but to try to dig up his identity long after the tour is over, and nothing evidently happened during the tour?

I just don't see any excuse for that.

[_Bret Ripley]

A beautiful place for an altar and 250-300 thousand partaker - in the nature..
The empty space:


...and the crowded one:

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

No, you wouldn't. Mainly because you wouldn't recognize a lady were she to drop you on your sitterdowner.

Well, if that's the case I certainly can identify a ****-stirring dramallama, Madame.

That's you, by the way... You know... Because you're dense.

Very Respectfully,

Doctor Cameron

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

I don't think Mr. LDSFaqs understands what Public Information means.

- Doc

[_MsJack]

The whole thing makes little sense. His explanation on Liz's board was ludicrous. I mean, I get the idea that you don't want to endure the discomfort of having someone harass you when you lead your tour, but to try to dig up his identity long after the tour is over, and nothing evidently happened during the tour?

I just don't see any excuse for that.

Right. I would have been more sympathetic had this happened prior to the tour. Almost a year after the tour? Not so much. And I'm totally not getting this whole "Dan felt threatened" angle, nor am I getting what it was that Everybody Wang Chung did that was allegedly illegal. Last I checked, troll-fu is not illegal.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Was Mr. Peterson harassed on his tour by someone?

- Doc

[_Bret Ripley]

Was Mr. Peterson harassed on his tour by someone?

Other than Gerald Bradford, you mean. If I recall correctly, it was during this tour that Dr. Peterson received a particularly distressing message via e-mail.