sock puppet wrote:So any discussion beyond just "yes" or "no" constitutes "whining" in your view?
Course not. You've misunderstood, my good man.
sock puppet wrote:So any discussion beyond just "yes" or "no" constitutes "whining" in your view?
MrStakhanovite wrote:MrStakhanovite wrote:I'd like to get this thread to page 42 before Friday night. Stem, you are gonna have to clock some overtime, but I think you can do it.
Thanks everyone!
sock puppet wrote:My theory is that stem thinks he's "on a mission from god" to try to frustrate critics into not posting on the 'net, so that doubting members and investigators won't Google upon us and the criticisms. It seems to me that stem is purposefully trying to derail and stifle. And for just one troll, he's accomplished quite a bit actually.
Darth J wrote:I think it's a sad commentary on the intellectual and ethical bankruptcy of Mormontology that when all the ludicrous ad hoc excuses have been exhausted, the only thing left is to become a pathetic, transparent troll.
stemelbow wrote:So let's get this back on topic again, I know its tough to do so for you.
I deserve to be outed because I come here to comment on the topic only to have you and others complain relentlessly about me. Everybody Wang Chung does not deserve to be found out a liar because he is on your team?
Great. It's all come together again.
stemelbow wrote:Darth J wrote:I think it's a sad commentary on the intellectual and ethical bankruptcy of Mormontology that when all the ludicrous ad hoc excuses have been exhausted, the only thing left is to become a pathetic, transparent troll.
Why would your pathetic, transparent tollishness be considered commentary on mormonsim? Your commentary on Mormonism is the least thoughtful and successful commentary I've ever read--as you've spiced some of your posts here with such nonsense.