Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the water

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Darth J wrote:I was afraid it wouldn't take you long to smoke me out. My devotion to the restored gospel must be obvious to you in the same way FBI profilers can track down serial killers.


Welcome back into the fold, Brother Darth J.

Steve Benson is one of the Lord's choicest missionaries.

He has the power to make new Mormons by unfounded accusation.

It is a new kind of "sealing power."
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Darth J »

Bazooka wrote:
Any chance we can get back on topic?


Perhaps we are much more on topic than the OP anticipated.
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Bazooka »

Brad Hudson wrote:
Bazooka wrote:
Any chance we can get back on topic?


Sorry, just trying to help.


It wasn't aimed at you Brad, you are on topic....those other reprobates however....
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_Steve Benson
_Emeritus
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 12:15 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Steve Benson »

Uncle Ed wrote:
Steve Benson wrote:
Monson has not admitted to any factual errors in his renditions of his Patton fable. He has simply re-baked his latest version to cover over his factual flops in the first, hoping that the faithful flock won't remember the initial rollout and blindly accept the second. There is plenty of hard evidence that Monson was both mistaken and lying, in both versions. The "body" was not in the right place or the right time in either Monson's 1969 first fly-by or in his second 2007 Kamikaze dive.

Close enough, Patton was known to "Tommy" as boys in school know each other. "Close boyhood friend" might be a stretch. But he does have that "Tommy" letter from Arthur's mother. Patton vanishes from human knowledge on a combat ship and TSM paints it as a "casualty of war". So what. The point of the story is that faith in the afterlife Trump's tragedy in this life.

I have felt understanding for your position over the years. To have the highest men in the church manipulate your grandfather like they obviously did is disturbing. Why not point out that with the same depth that you devote to debunking a partial myth?...


A significant part of the story (since it is Monson himself who has so often repeated it) is that Patton died, in battle, as a WW II combat casualty. Are you trying to ignore that oft-noted claim by Monson? Now, if only "prophet" Monson had admitted he was in the business of "partial" mythologizing. Then, at least he would be a partially-honest prophet.

(P.S.--I have, over many years, spoken publicly and at length about the Mormon Church's manipulation of my grandfather. No need for you to try to change the subject here).
Last edited by Guest on Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Darth J wrote:
Bazooka wrote:
Any chance we can get back on topic?


Perhaps we are much more on topic than the OP anticipated.


Yes, I think that all of this is most definitely on topic.

Darth J's testimony of Joseph Smith has been revealed in all of this, and I feel betrayed.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Bazooka
_Emeritus
Posts: 10719
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:36 am

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Bazooka »

Okay guys, you win.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Bazooka wrote:Okay guys, you win.


Sorry, Bazooka. We can get back to the issue of that rotten milk-drinking, chocolate-cake-eating, lying scoundrel Thomas S. Monson.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Kishkumen »

Although, I think the bigger tragedy here, which is not getting any of the press it deserves as long as we focus on the alleged fibs of Thomas S. Monson, is that anyone considers President Monson "the prophet" in the first place. I have no objection to him being the president of the LDS Church, alleged fibs and all, but I have a real difficult time picturing any of these CEOs of Mormonism as "the prophet."
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _zeezrom »

Benson who?
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Benson blows Monson's Arthur Patton tale out of the wate

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Bazooka wrote:Okay guys, you win.


Is that a golden RPG your avatar is carrying? If so, you should never give up!

My analysis:

(X+Y) ---> Z<.000000000001

Where:

X=Steve joins the conversation
Y=Someone disagrees with anything Steve says
Z=Percentage chance thread will stay on topic.

It's just math.
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
Post Reply