Bible verse by verse

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

maklelan wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:According to you there is no God and Jesus was not the Christ --- if Jesus existed at all. So much for your evidence... :lol:


No, that's not my position at all. Why do you pretend to be amused when it's abundantly clear to you and to everyone else reading that you're in way over your head and are just throwing everything you can at all the wall in the hopes that something will stick? You're not fooling anyone.

Jesus clearly believed that Noah was a real person and that the Flood really happened. Through Christ were all thing created. That means that Jesus is God. You are not fooling anyone --- Mormon or not.
_maklelan
_Emeritus
Posts: 4999
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:51 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _maklelan »

LittleNipper wrote:Jesus clearly believed that Noah was a real person and that the Flood really happened.


Not only is it not clear that what is contained in the New Testament is a verbatim account of Jesus' very words, but the rhetorical use of traditions like these does not necessarily indicate the speaker thought of the traditions as historical. I think it's likely that the author of the New Testament texts believed it, but to say that they "clearly" did is going well beyond what reason and the evidence indicate.

LittleNipper wrote:Through Christ were all thing created. That means that Jesus is God. You are not fooling anyone --- Mormon or not.


Oh, because YHWH created all things and then it says "through Christ all things were created." That means Jesus is God. Makes sense, except for the fact that agency in Greek and Hebrew, just like in English, is easily transferable and ambiguous. 1 Kgs 6:14 says Solomon built the temple, but I think it would be just as accurate (or more so) to so that through numerous workers the temple was built. This doesn't mean that Solomon was numerous workers, this is just an illustration of how agency is communicable. No one with any modicum of awareness of how language and rhetoric works could ever arrive at the utterly asinine notion that because the text says all things were created through Christ, Jesus must be God. That's just childish eisegesis.

But there's more! Matt 13:23 has Christ say to his disciples, "I have foretold you all things." Since you seem to be taking "all things" to literally mean "all things" contained within all reality, you must interpret this text to mean that Christ foretold to his disciples every event that would ever happen from their day to the end of creation, irrespective of how minuscule in importance or scope. My clipping my toenails after my shower this morning. My daughter having a nightmare last night. A little kid in Vanuatu going swimming. A middle-aged man in Athens waiting outside a government building in the morning to ask about work. A woman in Fraile Muerto signing up to attend the university in Montevideo. Is that how you interpret it, or do you acknowledge the rhetorical use of the New Testament's use of "all"?

Let's look at another New Testament text. Acts 2:5 says that men were dwelling at Jerusalem from "every nation under heaven." Do you really believe every nation under heaven was represented in Jerusalem at the time of Pentecost? There were people from China, Australia, the South Pacific, the Amazon, North America, the British Isles, and every other nation on the planet all dwelling in Jerusalem? Is that really how you interpret the author's use of "every," or do you acknowledge the rhetorical use of "every" in the New Testament?

Show me I'm not fooling anyone, Nipper. Show me you know what you're doing here, rather than just burping up ad hoc assertions and insults.
I like you Betty...

My blog
_huckelberry
_Emeritus
Posts: 4559
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:29 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _huckelberry »

maklelan wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:Jesus clearly believed that Noah was a real person and that the Flood really happened.


the rhetorical use of traditions like these does not necessarily indicate the speaker thought of the traditions as historical.


Please pardon my quoting this center of your comment for no better reason than that I think it makes sense.

I am puzzled by the worry about the source of a floods water being expressed in various posts above. If God wanted to flood the earth he could create out of nothing all the water needed and return it to nothing when no longer needed. Or if you are of a Mormon turn of mind for whom matter cannot be created it could be transported from a different planet and returned there. It is well within Gods power.

It is strange that believer go about proposing that the earths crust was torn apart. The construction of the layers of rock making up our world clearly show this did not happen, It is not even vaguely within the real world. But to believe a Noah flood does not require the mountains and valley to change, water could have left them just as they were before. That at least would fit what the evidence of the rocks say. It would not explain the problem of uninterrupted diversity of life in different continents nor the uninterrupted history of peoples history both which seem to indicate no worldwide flood happened.
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

maklelan wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:Jesus clearly believed that Noah was a real person and that the Flood really happened.


Not only is it not clear that what is contained in the New Testament is a verbatim account of Jesus' very words, but the rhetorical use of traditions like these does not necessarily indicate the speaker thought of the traditions as historical. I think it's likely that the author of the New Testament texts believed it, but to say that they "clearly" did is going well beyond what reason and the evidence indicate.

LittleNipper wrote:Through Christ were all thing created. That means that Jesus is God. You are not fooling anyone --- Mormon or not.


Oh, because YHWH created all things and then it says "through Christ all things were created." That means Jesus is God. Makes sense, except for the fact that agency in Greek and Hebrew, just like in English, is easily transferable and ambiguous. 1 Kgs 6:14 says Solomon built the temple, but I think it would be just as accurate (or more so) to so that through numerous workers the temple was built. This doesn't mean that Solomon was numerous workers, this is just an illustration of how agency is communicable. No one with any modicum of awareness of how language and rhetoric works could ever arrive at the utterly asinine notion that because the text says all things were created through Christ, Jesus must be God. That's just childish eisegesis.

Matt 13:23 has Christ say to his disciples, "I have foretold you all things." Since you seem to be taking "all things" to literally mean "all things" contained within all reality, you must interpret this text to mean that Christ foretold to his disciples every event that would ever happen from their day to the end of creation, irrespective of how minuscule in importance or scope. My clipping my toenails after my shower this morning. My daughter having a nightmare last night. A little kid in Vanuatu going swimming. A middle-aged man in Athens waiting outside a government building in the morning to ask about work. A woman in Fraile Muerto signing up to attend the university in Montevideo. Is that how you interpret it, or do you acknowledge the rhetorical use of the New Testament's use of "all"?

Let's look at another New Testament text. Acts 2:5 says that men were dwelling at Jerusalem from "every nation under heaven." Do you really believe every nation under heaven was represented in Jerusalem at the time of Pentecost? There were people from China, Australia, the South Pacific, the Amazon, North America, the British Isles, and every other nation on the planet all dwelling in Jerusalem? Is that really how you interpret the author's use of "every," or do you acknowledge the rhetorical use of "every" in the New Testament?

Show me I'm not fooling anyone, Nipper. Show me you know what you're doing here, rather than just burping up ad hoc assertions and insults.

Consider the events reported in Acts 2:5-11, the miracle at Pentecost ---- there is Scriptural clarification of what is meant when the writer speaks of every nation. The nations are listed and we are limited to JEWS. These would be the only nations where there were practicing Jews.
And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galileans? And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

In MARK 13:23 Christ say to his disciples, "I have foretold you all things." Since you seem to be taking "all things" --- literally... Again the clarification/perameters is found right there in the scripture.
9 “You must be on your guard. You will be handed over to the local councils and flogged in the synagogues. On account of me you will stand before governors and kings as witnesses to them. 10 And the gospel must first be preached to all nations. 11 Whenever you are arrested and brought to trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever is given you at the time, for it is not you speaking, but the Holy Spirit. 12 “Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child. Children will rebel against their parents and have them put to death. 13 Everyone will hate you because of me, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. 14 “When you see ‘the abomination that causes desolation’ standing where it does not belong—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 15 Let no one on the housetop go down or enter the house to take anything out. 16 Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. 17 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! 18 Pray that this will not take place in winter, 19 because those will be days of distress unequaled from the beginning, when God created the world, until now—and never to be equaled again. 20 “If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive. But for the sake of the elect, whom he has chosen, he has shortened them. 21 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘Look, there he is!’ do not believe it. 22 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 23 So be on your guard; I have told you everything ahead of time. 22for false Christs and false prophets will arise, and will show signs and wonders, in order to lead astray, if possible, the elect. 23"But take heed; behold, I have told you everything in advance.

1 Kgs 6:14 says Solomon built the temple. God told David not to built the temple. Solomon had visiting dignitaries who gave him the cedar, silver, and the gold. Solomon was obviously the one God placed in charge and the plans came through Solomon. Solomon had the final ok.

The Bible is what I use to clarify the Bible.
_maklelan
_Emeritus
Posts: 4999
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:51 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _maklelan »

LittleNipper wrote:Consider the events reported in Acts 2:5-11, the miracle at Pentecost ---- there is Scriptural clarification of what is meant when the writer speaks of every nation. The nations are listed and we are limited to JEWS. These would be the only nations where there were practicing Jews.


No, that's just begging the question. The statement is "Jews out of every nation under heaven," not "Jews out of every nation under heaven were Jews live."

LittleNipper wrote:And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.


Yes, this qualifies the identities of the people in Jerusalem, it does not qualify the word "all." This may be the kind of eisegetic nonsense that gets you internet points with other naïve fundies, but I'm afraid I'm not quite as gullible.

LittleNipper wrote:In MARK 13:23 Christ say to his disciples, "I have foretold you all things." Since you seem to be taking "all things" --- literally... Again the clarification/perameters is found right there in the scripture.
9 “You must be on your guard. You will be handed over to the local councils and flogged in the synagogues. On account of me you will stand before governors and kings as witnesses to them. 10 And the gospel must first be preached to all nations. 11 Whenever you are arrested and brought to trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever is given you at the time, for it is not you speaking, but the Holy Spirit. 12 “Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child. Children will rebel against their parents and have them put to death. 13 Everyone will hate you because of me, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. 14 “When you see ‘the abomination that causes desolation’ standing where it does not belong—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 15 Let no one on the housetop go down or enter the house to take anything out. 16 Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. 17 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! 18 Pray that this will not take place in winter, 19 because those will be days of distress unequaled from the beginning, when God created the world, until now—and never to be equaled again. 20 “If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive. But for the sake of the elect, whom he has chosen, he has shortened them. 21 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘Look, there he is!’ do not believe it. 22 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 23 So be on your guard; I have told you everything ahead of time. 22for false Christs and false prophets will arise, and will show signs and wonders, in order to lead astray, if possible, the elect. 23"[b]But take heed; behold, I have told you everything in advance.


Again, you're just making up an interpretive key out of whole cloth. Good grief, where did you receive your training in exegesis? This is an honest question. Where did you study Bible?

LittleNipper wrote:The Bible is what I use to clarify the Bible.


Which is why you're forced to just make stuff up. Additionally, you don't understand the Bible at all.
I like you Betty...

My blog
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

maklelan wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:In MARK 13:23 Christ say to his disciples, "I have foretold you all things." Since you seem to be taking "all things" --- literally... Again the clarification/perameters is found right there in the scripture.
9 “You must be on your guard. You will be handed over to the local councils and flogged in the synagogues. On account of me you will stand before governors and kings as witnesses to them. 10 And the gospel must first be preached to all nations. 11 Whenever you are arrested and brought to trial, do not worry beforehand about what to say. Just say whatever is given you at the time, for it is not you speaking, but the Holy Spirit. 12 “Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child. Children will rebel against their parents and have them put to death. 13 Everyone will hate you because of me, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved. 14 “When you see ‘the abomination that causes desolation’ standing where it does not belong—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 15 Let no one on the housetop go down or enter the house to take anything out. 16 Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. 17 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! 18 Pray that this will not take place in winter, 19 because those will be days of distress unequaled from the beginning, when God created the world, until now—and never to be equaled again. 20 “If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive. But for the sake of the elect, whom he has chosen, he has shortened them. 21 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘Look, there he is!’ do not believe it. 22 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 23 So be on your guard; I have told you everything ahead of time. 22for false Christs and false prophets will arise, and will show signs and wonders, in order to lead astray, if possible, the elect. 23"[b]But take heed; behold, I have told you everything in advance.


Again, you're just making up an interpretive key out of whole cloth. Good grief, where did you receive your training in exegesis? This is an honest question. Where did you study Bible?

LittleNipper wrote:The Bible is what I use to clarify the Bible.


Which is why you're forced to just make stuff up. Additionally, you don't understand the Bible at all.

What did I make up? I SIMPLY quoted the Bible. I backed up to verse 9. Those verses totally explained verse 23. You are the one who takes verses out of context. I studied the Bible at Liberty Baptist College, now LBU. The Church I attend has connections to LBU, Cairn University, and Dallas Theological Seminary ----- to name a few. And where did you study the Bible --- or can I guess? :rolleyes:
Last edited by Guest on Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _LittleNipper »

maklelan wrote:
LittleNipper wrote:Consider the events reported in Acts 2:5-11, the miracle at Pentecost ---- there is Scriptural clarification of what is meant when the writer speaks of every nation. The nations are listed and we are limited to JEWS. These would be the only nations where there were practicing Jews.


No, that's just begging the question. The statement is "Jews out of every nation under heaven," not "Jews out of every nation under heaven were Jews live."

LittleNipper wrote:And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.


The reality is that the countries mentioned represent the ancestry of countries across this entire planet. As these Jews left Jerusalem, every people group was represented.
_maklelan
_Emeritus
Posts: 4999
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:51 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _maklelan »

LittleNipper wrote:The reality is that the countries mentioned represent the ancestry of countries across this entire planet. As these Jews left Jerusalem, every people group was represented.


That's utter and complete nonsense. I know this childish hermeneutic is deeply embedded in you, but if you really think anyone reading this is taking it seriously, you're far more naïve than I ever could have anticipated.
I like you Betty...

My blog
_Gunnar
_Emeritus
Posts: 6315
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:17 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _Gunnar »

The reality is that the countries mentioned represent the ancestry of countries across this entire planet. As these Jews left Jerusalem, every people group was represented.

LittleNipper

The reality also is, as I understand it, that all of the countries mentioned were in regions in which the lingua franca at that time was either Greek or Aramaic--precisely the languages that Christ and his disciples would have been most likely to know. Because of Galilee and Judea's location and political situation at the time, it would have been economically and socially advantageous for their residents to be familiar with both of those languages, and it would be unremarkable if either Christ or any of his disciples were among those who were conversant in both.

Maklelan, please correct me if I am mistaken about that.

Still, as Mak already pointed out, your interpretation is a remarkably irrational stretch. But then, it is a remarkably irrational stretch to conclude that The Bible as we know it now is necessarily inerrant, or that it ever really was even at the time that the various writings that eventually became part of The Bible were written.
Last edited by Guest on Mon Jun 16, 2014 6:07 am, edited 6 times in total.
No precept or claim is more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.

“If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you.”
― Harlan Ellison
_maklelan
_Emeritus
Posts: 4999
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:51 am

Re: Bible verse by verse

Post by _maklelan »

LittleNipper wrote:What did I make up? I SIMPLY quoted the Bible.


Your reading of Acts was conjured out of nothing. The notion that you have even the foggiest idea how one might go about using the Bible to clarify the Bible is conjured out of nothing. The notion that the Bible is inerrant is conjured out of nothing. The notion that the Bible is univocal is conjured out of nothing. The list goes on and on and on. All your dogmas are just factoids that have been invented and have been passed down to you for proliferation. When you attempt to defend them, you are forced to just invent more nonsense. Of course, I've tried to get you to defend them, and all you've done is run around in circles shouting "Nu-uh!" at me.

LittleNipper wrote:I backed up to verse 9. Those verses totally explained verse 23.


They do absolutely nothing of the sort. You're just groping for whatever you can find to rationalize away the rhetorical use of the phrase "every nation." There is no exegetical standard that has ever existed that has ever demanded we must understand "every nation under heaven" to be qualified by whatever non-pleonastic list that follows, no matter the source of the list. You haven't the foggiest idea what you're talking about.

LittleNipper wrote:You are the one who takes verses out of context. I studied the Bible at Liberty Baptist College, now LBU. The Church I attend has connections to LBU, Cairn University, and Dallas Theological Seminary ----- to name a few. And where did you study the Bible --- or can I guess? :rolleyes:


I have so far studied the Bible at BYU, at the University of Oxford, and at Trinity Western University. If you have had training, then kindly translate the following phrases and parse the verbs:

εἰσέλθετε εἰς ἀγορὰν δῶρα παρά γε τῶν ἀδικούντων ληφόμενοι

שלם מראן אלה שמיא ישאל שגיא בכל עדן

Then I'd like you to tell me what biblical text is quoted Odes of Solomon 2:43, as well as the other Old Testament and New Testament texts that drew from the Hebrew and Greek versions of that source.

Then I'd like you to tell me what aspect of Philistine material culture leads Israel Finkelstein to date their appearance in Syria-Palestine so much later than the traditional chronology.

After that, you can tell me how people like Mittens misuse the Granville Sharps rule.

Then you can explain why early Christians moved from an adoptive conceptualization of Christ's relationship to God to the procreative conceptualization, but didn't abandon the former.

When you can do all that without scurrying off to google, I'll believe you have an adequate biblical training. If you continue to pretend to talk down to me about my training and competence, then everyone will know you're just making stuff up.
I like you Betty...

My blog
Post Reply