Zub Zool oan and Abraham 1:2b?????3

[_Everybody Wang Chung]

I would like to thank the person that resurrected this old thread. I had not seen this before.

I would highly recommend reading this thread. It's VERY enlightening.....

[_Sanctorian]

Can someone define the KEP for me? I only lost my testimony 3 years ago and since this is 4 years old, I just don't know what the KEP is.

[_maklelan]

Can someone define the KEP for me? I only lost my testimony 3 years ago and since this is 4 years old, I just don't know what the KEP is.

Kirtland Egyptian Papers.

[_Sanctorian]

Can someone define the KEP for me? I only lost my testimony 3 years ago and since this is 4 years old, I just don't know what the KEP is.

Kirtland Egyptian Papers.

Thank you.

[_Bret Ripley]

basszátok meg
https://translate.google.com/?hl=en#hu/ ... 1tok%20meg

Yikes! It would be hard to fit much Hungarian onto gold or brass tablets without a condensing algorithm.

Does Reformed Hungarian exist?

No need to reform a perfect language.

Please, see Hungarian language

A Hungarian sermon from 12th century (for Shades ! no nipples on the picture...)

[_Everybody Wang Chung]

Can someone define the KEP for me? I only lost my testimony 3 years ago and since this is 4 years old, I just don't know what the KEP is.

Kirtland Egyptian Papers.

Now that you've read this thread and the link Mak sent, I'm dying to know if your testimony has been restored?

[_Sanctorian]

Now that you've read this thread and the link Mak sent, I'm dying to know if your testimony has been restored?

This is a hard one for me. I would like to be fascinated by this research and theory, but even if it wasn't completely over my head, I can't understand how a God would require such high level intellect in understanding the Book of Abraham? Surely God, if he really did inspire Joseph to "translate" the Book of Abraham that was to be used for ALL humanity, would have come up with a simple process for understanding the Book of Abraham for simple minded folks such as myself. The fact that you need a PhD to even read this material is evidence enough that the Book of Abraham was nothing more than a made up scripture at best and complete fraud at worst. That's my opinion.

[_Bazooka]

Now that you've read this thread and the link Mak sent, I'm dying to know if your testimony has been restored?

This is a hard one for me. I would like to be fascinated by this research and theory, but even if it wasn't completely over my head, I can't understand how a God would require such high level intellect in understanding the Book of Abraham? Surely God, if he really did inspire Joseph to "translate" the Book of Abraham that was to be used for ALL humanity, would have come up with a simple process for understanding the Book of Abraham for simple minded folks such as myself. The fact that you need a PhD to even read this material is evidence enough that the Book of Abraham was nothing more than a made up scripture at best and complete fraud at worst. That's my opinion.

You should keep in mind that maklelan is researching this from a point of view that the Book of Abraham is nothing to do with Abraham and that the text of it came from Joseph Smith. He isn't (I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong) trying to support the legitimacy of the Book of Abraham as what the Church claims it is.

[_Sanctorian]

This is a hard one for me. I would like to be fascinated by this research and theory, but even if it wasn't completely over my head, I can't understand how a God would require such high level intellect in understanding the Book of Abraham? Surely God, if he really did inspire Joseph to "translate" the Book of Abraham that was to be used for ALL humanity, would have come up with a simple process for understanding the Book of Abraham for simple minded folks such as myself. The fact that you need a PhD to even read this material is evidence enough that the Book of Abraham was nothing more than a made up scripture at best and complete fraud at worst. That's my opinion.

You should keep in mind that maklelan is researching this from a point of view that the Book of Abraham is nothing to do with Abraham and that the text of it came from Joseph Smith. He isn't (I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong) trying to support the legitimacy of the Book of Abraham as what the Church claims it is.

So what's the point of the Book of Abraham if it isn't what the church claims it to be? Inspired fiction that has nothing to do with the plan of salvation?

[_Craig Paxton]

I tried I really did...but then my eyes began to gloss over and well...I just couldn't get past the Zub Zool? Really?