Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2118
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Dr Exiled »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 11:25 pm
Wut. Dating app thing? I don’t even want to know. However, that’s three things now.

1) Affair with weird traipsing the line sex stuff.

2) Horn doggin’ some chick on Facebook. Traipsing the line.

3) Dating app thing for another woman. Whiffing the dating thing ‘cause *shivers* sooooo good.

What the “F” is going on here with this guy?

- Doc
Check it out if you can last through the whole thing. JD flirts and fawns over her and then with about 17 or 18 mins to go, he wants to get her a date .....

https://www.mormonstories.org/podcast/l ... rector-jr/
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
User avatar
Jersey Girl
God
Posts: 8349
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:51 am
Location: In my head

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Jersey Girl »

Dr Exiled wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 1:06 am


Check it out if you can last through the whole thing. JD flirts and fawns over her and then with about 17 or 18 mins to go, he wants to get her a date .....

https://www.mormonstories.org/podcast/l ... rector-jr/
Gosh. Give us a little push in the right direction. There are 4 parts there. Which one best demonstrates what you are talking about?
LIGHT HAS A NAME

We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF

Slava Ukraini!
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2118
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Dr Exiled »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 3:09 am
Dr Exiled wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 1:06 am


Check it out if you can last through the whole thing. John Dehlin flirts and fawns over her and then with about 17 or 18 mins to go, he wants to get her a date .....

https://www.mormonstories.org/podcast/l ... rector-jr/
Gosh. Give us a little push in the right direction. There are 4 parts there. Which one best demonstrates what you are talking about?
If I recall, at the first he is flirty, and maybe periodically throughout, but the last 18 minutes or so of the last part is where Dehlin tries to get her a date.

It just struck me as a little odd, like he wanted to do more than he did but was constrained in a kind of cringe worthy way.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 7920
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Moksha »

Dr Exiled wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 3:21 am
If I recall, at the first he is flirty, and maybe periodically throughout, but the last 18 minutes or so of the last part is where Dehlin tries to get her a date.

It just struck me as a little odd, like he wanted to do more than he did but was constrained in a kind of cringe worthy way.
You guys must be super perceptive because John seemed to be doing a lot of reflective listening in a non-flirty manner. That last part of Lila's stating what she would like in a man did not seem cringe-worthy, unless reading the same type of stuff in a women's magazine seems cringey. I could almost envision some General Authority saying, "Oh, darned" when she said her ideal man should be older, but not too old.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
SaturdaysVoyeur
CTR A
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri May 14, 2021 7:24 am

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by SaturdaysVoyeur »

Lem wrote:
Thu May 20, 2021 10:04 pm
The comments from consiglieri and Kishkumen have been extremely revealing. It is people like these two that make it so difficult to come forward when something has happened.
Wow. I could not disagree more. Kish has greatly impressed me with his ability to not compromise on applying reasonable skepticism, while never using "reason" as a pretense to be dismissive, condescending, or callous towards the experiences of women (in general or when directly engaging with a woman, myself included).

I've observed Kish to try on different perspectives to see whether they make sense, rather than digging in his heels and just pounding the table in support of his initial position, and yet he also seems well aware that sexual violence happens in dark corners and in crazy-making ways, where a lack of evidence or a single apparent contradiction can easily be used to discredit the victim and to discredit women in general. Dudes, listen up: Kish gets it.

Consiglieri? Well....my mama always said if I couldn't say anything nice, I shouldn't say anything at all.

So.....back to the voyeuristic gossip.....

I'm still currently seven pages from the end of this thread, so maybe somebody's already come up with what seems to me the most blatantly obvious theory about SexyPicGate:

Facebook doesn't notify you when somebody unlikes one of your posts (just like it doesn't notify you if someone unfriends you or stops following you).

However, Facebook does sometimes send duplicate notifications of the same interaction, such as a comment or a like. It doesn't happen constantly, but often enough that I've noticed it.

Doesn't it make the most sense to think that Dehlin, who was planning to interview the couple soon, was going through their Facebook pages to prepare for the interview; along the way, he liked a dozen or so of her pics, Facebook sent her duplicate notifications, leading her to think he had unliked them all and then re-liked them all?

Even if he did do that, I'm not clear on what kind of "secret message" that's supposed to be sending? If anyone here ever gets a hankering to creep me out on Facebook, I'm just telling you now: You're going to have to be more obvious than that, ok?

It's an enormous stretch to call most of the photos in question remotely "sexy," in the sense that she wasn't scantily clad, or posing in a sexy or silly-sexy way. She's still got the screenshots of his likes up on her Facebook and most of them are pretty quotidian pics. One of them she's wearing a snowsuit (oo-la-la!). In a couple others, she's posed with her (I assume) her husband in front of their Christmas tree. One of them is a meme and not a picture of her at all.

Dehlin's reply is also still up on her Facebook:
"I am so incredibly sorry for acting in ways that made you feel uncomfortable and unsafe. [Dehlin's wife] and I have never stopped adoring you and [her husband], so this is a total shock to me.
But I want to learn all about how I made you feel uncomfortable, and how I can make sure this never happens again. With anyone.
Again. I’m so, so sorry. I have messaged you privately. Thank you for letting me know about this. I’m so sorry that you and [her husband] are having to deal with this."

That's got to be about the LEAST rapey, LEAST creepy response I've ever seen from any man whom I do not personally know. And if he's being insincere, I'd like to know how much he would charge for acting classes. Even his subsequent message to her, the one that he requested not go public, is pretty reasonable, considering that by then he had a large number of people accusing him of being a creeper as a result of SexyPicGate.

Granted, it is a little unusual for Facebook to send duplicate notifications a couple of days later, but I have received message notifications on Facebook for DMs that I had sent days before. In other words, a friend and I are chatting via private message on Facebook. I happened to have the last message on the thread. Then a few days later, Facebook sends me a message notification for my own final message to that person from a few days earlier.

tl;dr Facebook notifications are glitchy.

I could understand her reaction to all this a little more if she'd had a pre-existing negative relationship with the man. That does get into borderline stalker territory. I haven't had it happen with any former lovers, but I have had two former friends show up out of the blue and start liking or replying to multiple things on my Facebook page. I just blocked them. (It might also apply if I had no idea who the person was, but that's never happened to me so I'm not sure how I would feel. It would probably depend on what exactly they did. Leaving messages like, "I know where you live," would surely feel different than just liking a bunch of my photos.)

Anyway, apparently Dehlin and this woman, along with both of their spouses, had had a positive relationship up until SexyPicGate. The couple was planning to appear on Mormon Stories after four years of considering it, but, she posted later, "Now, I could never look across the room at him and go to the vulnerable place that I need to go to tell my story."

Ok, fair enough. Like I said to Kish before, your story is YOUR story, and no one has a right to it unless you WANT to share it. Period, end of story. And a person can change their mind about whether to share their story for any reason whatsoever. Or for no explainable reason at all. It's sort of like sexual consent that way.

But her message does suggest there may be some type of trauma in her past that she's projecting onto Dehlin's more "Grandpa's-poking-me-on-Facebook"-type of behavior. I see absolutely nothing sexual or suggestive about it, especially when you actually look at the photos in question. It's a bit much to interpret it, as she does: "And his weird resurfacing of my old posts to send cryptic messages just to mess with my head were so horrible."

That is a LOT of projection going on right there! I was thinking to myself, Bitch, will you stop making us all look crazy?!, when I read on: "This happened back in January right after I had gotten a concussion."

Among other symptoms, a concussion or head injury causes confusion, memory loss, difficulty concentrating, and irritability.

Suddenly, SexyPicGate is looking more like a Facebook glitch misconstrued by someone with a very recently acquired medical condition that, by definition, causes (usually temporary) difficulties in perception, and who had had some trauma in her past to the extent that she had been uncertain for quite a long time as to whether she wanted to tell her story publicly because of the emotional toll it would take on her. I don't underestimate either factor.

It's possible that just the thought of being on the verge of publicly telling her story was beginning to trigger some PTSD-like reactions. Because even if we cast Dehlin's behavior on her Facebook in the WORST possible light, as trying to send her secret unwanted sexual messages---which is already quite a stretch---I otherwise can't imagine how that would be enough to cause her to be so terrorized, literally shaking in fear of him, etc.

Dehlin then deletes all of her screenshots and discussion of this off of his Facebook, which she says makes her feel like he's covering her mouth with his hand, except that she proceeds to outline her complaint on her own Facebook, where it still sits today. Why should Dehlin leave her accusations up on his own Facebook page, especially since it's just going to lead to the entire Rosebud Brigade coming back out in full force again to accuse him of being a Creepy, Rapey Stalker?

Yes, sometimes it takes multiple complaints before a powerful man faces any consequences for his sexually violent behavior. It's true that women often don't come forward because we won't be believed. Because any inconsistency in our story will be used against us. Because we'll be blamed for something that we were doing, not doing, wearing, or not wearing at the time. Or just because, frankly, low-level sexual violence is so COMMON that there's not much point. It's the cumulative effect, the unstated, "I could do anything to you that I want and you can't stop me" that's more damaging than the butt-grope in the subway that virtually every woman on the planet has experienced.

But with Dehlin, I just don't see any "there" there. A dopey extramarital affair that was possibly the Most Sexlessly Mormon Thing Ever. And a possible Facebook glitch that affected a woman suffering from a recent head injury. And....c'mon, help me out here....what else...?

Oh, yeah. He once remarked upon Kate Kelly wearing a dress with neckline that plunged dramatically to her waist that, boy, she sure wasn't wearing any garments under that, huh? That's a joke that I might have made in that moment, and I'm a straight chick.

So remind me again how Dehlin is preying on women? Because, while the "Epic Rosebud" thread gave me some empathy for Rosebud, this thread is starting to give me some empathy for Dehlin. Perhaps he sounds a little besieged right now because he actually IS under siege.

This crap is all a big distraction from the actual problem of constant, usually low-level, sexual violence that restricts women's lives and keeps us in our place---at home, where we are in, by far, the most danger of being beaten, raped, or killed than anywhere else on the planet.
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2118
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Dr Exiled »

Moksha wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 4:23 am
Dr Exiled wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 3:21 am
If I recall, at the first he is flirty, and maybe periodically throughout, but the last 18 minutes or so of the last part is where Dehlin tries to get her a date.

It just struck me as a little odd, like he wanted to do more than he did but was constrained in a kind of cringe worthy way.
You guys must be super perceptive because John seemed to be doing a lot of reflective listening in a non-flirty manner. That last part of Lila's stating what she would like in a man did not seem cringe-worthy, unless reading the same type of stuff in a women's magazine seems cringey. I could almost envision some General Authority saying, "Oh, darned" when she said her ideal man should be older, but not too old.
I guess putting her on the spot was where I kind of cringed. The matchmaking stuff didn't seemed planned and I don't think he's done that before or since. Probably nothing but I found it to be a little odd. Does he try to play matchmaker at his thrive conferences?
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9231
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Kishkumen »

I guess putting her on the spot was where I kind of cringed. The matchmaking stuff didn't seemed planned and I don't think he's done that before or since. Probably nothing but I found it to be a little odd. Does he try to play matchmaker at his thrive conferences?
I admit that this was memorably odd to me. I remember it made me feel uncomfortable for her. But I think it was more the case that I felt embarrassed on her behalf that he was drawing so much attention to her relationship status and somewhat intrusively, officiously, AND publicly inserting himself in her life. It sounded well intentioned but kinda, well, obtuse. But different people react to these things in different ways. I don’t know how she actually felt about it.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9231
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Kishkumen »

Suddenly, SexyPicGate is looking more like a Facebook glitch misconstrued by someone with a very recently acquired medical condition that, by definition, causes (usually temporary) difficulties in perception, and who had had some trauma in her past to the extent that she had been uncertain for quite a long time as to whether she wanted to tell her story publicly because of the emotional toll it would take on her. I don't underestimate either factor.
Thank you for this, SV. I feel a lot more sympathetic for this person, and a lot more regretful on John Dehlin’s behalf that he berated her so. Having suffered a concussion that landed me first in the hospital and then in a chair at a therapist, I have some idea of how disorienting in the long term such an injury can be (I have some permanent memory loss of the time after my injury). I hope there was no lasting damage done, and I wish her all the best. To have JD cone down on her so hard must have been truly upsetting. He really overreacted, I think, although I understand it is difficult to bear all of the emotions that can bombard a person in his position.

Thank you also for your kind words.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Meadowchik
Elder
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:54 am

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Meadowchik »

SaturdaysVoyeur wrote:
Sat May 22, 2021 6:22 am
except that she proceeds to outline her complaint on her own Facebook, where it still sits today.
Do you mean on her own wall? On what day?
Meadowchik
Elder
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:54 am

Re: Problematic John Dehlin, a short list

Post by Meadowchik »

consiglieri wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 3:45 pm
But this person has NOT “come forward.”
She did come forward, in the Facebook group where Dehlin asked for help compiling anti-misogynist do's and don'ts.
consiglieri wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 3:45 pm

This makes everything you post hearsay.

The primary reason hearsay is not admissible is because the declarant is shielded from cross-examination.
It sounds like you are talking about rules in a court of law. Why are you comparing this board to a court of law? Dehlin has curated his Facebook group and the post in question, and I bring another point of view of what happened on his page here.

In neither forum is there a court case going on.
consiglieri wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 3:45 pm

Another issue I have is with Lem calling me a pig.
I try to refrain from name-calling. I do think your behavior in this thread has been very disappointing.

In addition to what Lem described, you did something else which I find manipulative. To be specific, it looks like you've intentionally made inaccurate statements when you must know they're inaccurate. Why? Are you trying to bait me or others to doxx the woman on this board?
consiglieri wrote:
Fri May 21, 2021 3:45 pm

This is because, according to the rules of your game, what is good for the goose is not good for the gander.

Should the time come when you really want women to be treated as equals, I will continue to engage with you.

Until then, I am no longer interested in playing this game by your decidedly unequal rules.
Name-calling excepted, I agree with Lem's general characterization of your statements in this topic. It sucks to see you talk like you've done here. Really.
Last edited by Meadowchik on Sat May 22, 2021 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply