Water Dog wrote:Lemmie wrote:Given that your first post on this thread speculated, with no verification despite repeated CFRs, that the parents had a history of being troublemakers, your interpretation of the interview is suspect, at best. Add that to your disgusting comments throughout this thread about the girl and her family, and you have no credibility at all. Your channeling of WS is right on target, however.
Did anyone else see the interview, or know of a transcript? I can't access the link.
Lemmie, my interpretation is my interpretation. You can disagree all you want, howl at the moon, dance a jig, chant a seance, and I'll still disagree with you. You having a different opinion doesn't make me wrong. My opinion is my opinion. That is all.
I have no problem with opinions. Please provide support for the statements of fact, included in your opinion, that I have bolded:
Well, Dehlin did at the very least provide proof positive that this whole thing was a stunt by the mother, and also that maybe the November Policy is a good thing.
The mother spoke more than the girl did in that interview, and straight up admitted to conceiving and planning the whole thing... for the specific purpose of embarrassing the church. I think she's gotten way more mileage out of it than she had planned, but nonetheless.