Well, so much for having a light-hearted thread. Oh well.
canpakes wrote:Ceeboo -
I think what is going on here is that Schmo is not arguing that listening to Rush will necessarily make someone intolerant and/or bigoted, but that someone defined as such might prefer listening to Rush given a certain range of choices.
You have a special gift of swooping in to defend anyone who possesses views on the political left - And only those on the political left. Makes me believe that the motivating factor for your defense is, in very large part, because you share those political views. What other reason could possibly explain your selected swooping?
Or, I guess it could be possible that you have never seen a post here - ever (written by someone who is politically left leaning) that you thought was bigoted or intolerant. Perhaps this is the reason that I haven't seen you swoop in a balanced position?
Here is the quote:
There is no surer way to foster and reinforce your ignorance and bigotry than listening to Rush Limbaugh. It's crystal clear that the obvious suggestion here is that Limbaugh is intolerant and bigoted - So listening to him will reinforce and foster the listeners intolerance and bigotry. There is simply no other way for reasonable people to come to an alternate conclusion.
You've mentioned the so-called unbridgeable divide with regard to political discussion quite a few times in the last several weeks. You've stated that you don't think that it can be overcome. You've reached that point because you must have classified those folks that seem very counter to your own political sensibilities as unreachable, and you don't feel like trying to find a way around that. Is that a correct assessment of your position?
Not really.
I have given my personal opinion that the political divide in this country has reached a point that it is unbridgeable. This view is based on a number of factors (None of which involve mere dissent of political opinions and/or the various political sensibilities that can be found among the collective citizens of this country.) Rather, this unbridgeable divide has been created (for the most part) directly because of the wide spread and complete intolerance of political dissent that can be easily seen on a daily basis all over this country.
But you are now arguing that characterizing a person that has openly espoused viewpoints that are typically judged (for right or wrong - the determination for you is yours alone to make) as bigoted, is just as erroneous as the attitudes expressed by the one claimed to be the bigot. In other words, seeking to identify bigotry is, in itself, bigotry.
Nonsense!
I was arguing that assigning bigotry and intolerance to someone who listens to Rush on a Saturday - because they listen to Rush on Saturday - is itself bigoted and intolerant............Because it is.
Isn't what you are doing here just another version of what Prager - in that opinion piece by him that you posted a while back - was identifying as problematic?
So far, this thread about what people listen to on their car radios has pointed out Limbaugh, Prager and Hannity in a negative light. (Again, I can't imagine why?)
Let me ask you a question:
Do you think that anyone who reads or listens to politically left views - like the New York Times - is fostering their bigotry and intolerance?
For the record, I don't think that every person that reads this paper (Left leaning to be certain - and one of the most read papers in this country) - is fostering and reinforcing their personal bigotry and intolerance because they read the paper. I would assume that most people read it because they like the paper.
For clarity, let me ask you a few questions:
Her are a few quotes by NY Times writer Sarah Jeong:
"Oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men."
"white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants".
"Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins," (I couldn't post some of her other disgusting, hate filled, racist, bigoted and intolerant comments as they would be against the board's rules)
what do you think about these? Do you think they are bigoted and intolerant?
And what is your opinion about the Ne York times' decision to stand by Sarah?
Hoe about this one?
What do you think about the elected and sitting democratic congresswoman from California. Maxine Waters, who issued a clarion call to her fellow democrats - which among other things - encouraged and incited mob violence against dissenting political views.
Here is one of Maxine's recent quotes: "God is on our side! On the side of the children. … Let's make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere."
Can you find any bigotry or intolerance in that?
Does listening to Waters foster and reinforce the bigotry and intolerance of those who listen to her or support her or enjoy hearing her opinions?
(In an effort to be fair, I should add that Senate Minority Leader, Chuck Schumer a democrat in NY has publicly denounced Water's comments)
How about the ever growing Antifa population - What's your personal opinion about these violent American militant groups that are popping up all over this country? Do you think they exhibit any bigotry and intolerance? Do you support them?
Edited to fix spelling errors.