Kavanaugh and Perjury

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Water Dog »

More about Leyland Keyser.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... tness.html

'Leland was completely blindsided by her name being thrown into it all. The first thing she knew about it was when she woke up on Thursday morning and her name was just everywhere. It was crazy.'
Pictured here for the first time since the news Ford had named her as a witness, Keyser showed the strain of being catapulted into this political maelstrom.
...

The family member who asked not to be named explained: 'She's just trying to get through it and hoping for it all to die down.

'It really felt a lot like Christine was the one called to the principal's office to give an account of something and just threw her under the bus. You know, just reached for a name.'

...

Speaking in her defense Keyser's loved one noted: 'I think it's quite convenient that she named the person who is frankly probably the least physically capable of all of them to stand up and be subjected to questioning or give her account.'


Ford's testimony about her "friend."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yF9X3NqcgE

In her testimony, Blasey casually insinuated a falsehood, that her friend was having brain problems, while pretending to be only concerned about her "health challenges." She could have said something like, "Well, she's having back and neck problems. Maybe she's tired from that and her memory isn't sharp." Which would be a honest admission of the message she was trying to pump out. Instead, she implied it sneakily. Pretending to be oh-so-innocently worrying about her friend's health while sticking the "Leland is too brain-damaged to remember" dagger in her back.

That's not a strong indicator that she is honest about other things. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as DaNang Dick said. Or, "if you say 7 or 8 things that are very likely but not quite certain to be lies, it's essentially certain that at least one of them is a lie," as Nate Silver likes to put it.

And then after all this, Ford has her FBI agent muscle, McLean, lean on her. "Right-wing Republican rape apologists are using you to destroy your old friend. But no pressure, no pressure."
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Water Dog »

Oh, and this.

Image
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Maksutov »

Water Dog wrote:Oh, and this.

Image


It's a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy, Dog. :lol: :eek: :lol: :eek:

Image
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Water Dog wrote:More about Leyland Keyser.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... tness.html

'Leland was completely blindsided by her name being thrown into it all. The first thing she knew about it was when she woke up on Thursday morning and her name was just everywhere. It was crazy.'
Pictured here for the first time since the news Ford had named her as a witness, Keyser showed the strain of being catapulted into this political maelstrom.
...

The family member who asked not to be named explained: 'She's just trying to get through it and hoping for it all to die down.

'It really felt a lot like Christine was the one called to the principal's office to give an account of something and just threw her under the bus. You know, just reached for a name.'

...

Speaking in her defense Keyser's loved one noted: 'I think it's quite convenient that she named the person who is frankly probably the least physically capable of all of them to stand up and be subjected to questioning or give her account.'


Ford's testimony about her "friend."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yF9X3NqcgE

In her testimony, Blasey casually insinuated a falsehood, that her friend was having brain problems, while pretending to be only concerned about her "health challenges." She could have said something like, "Well, she's having back and neck problems. Maybe she's tired from that and her memory isn't sharp." Which would be a honest admission of the message she was trying to pump out. Instead, she implied it sneakily. Pretending to be oh-so-innocently worrying about her friend's health while sticking the "Leland is too brain-damaged to remember" dagger in her back.

That's not a strong indicator that she is honest about other things. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as DaNang Dick said. Or, "if you say 7 or 8 things that are very likely but not quite certain to be lies, it's essentially certain that at least one of them is a lie," as Nate Silver likes to put it.

And then after all this, Ford has her FBI agent muscle, McLean, lean on her. "Right-wing Republican rape apologists are using you to destroy your old friend. But no pressure, no pressure."


WD, quote exactly where Ford insinuated Leland had "brain problems." Here's the transcript of your clip:

MITCHELL: OK. Do you have any particular motives to ascribe to Leland?

FORD: I guess we could take those one at a time. Leland has significant health challenges, and I’m happy that she’s focusing on herself and getting the health treatment that she needs, and she let me know that she needed her lawyer to take care of this for her, and she texted me right afterward with an apology and good wishes, and et cetera, So I’m glad that she’s taking care of herself.

I don’t expect that P.J. and Leland would remember this evening. It was a very unremarkable party. It was not one of their more notorious parties, because nothing remarkable happened to them that evening. They were downstairs.


This is just another one of your puppy turds.
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Water Dog wrote:More about Leyland Keyser.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... tness.html

'Leland was completely blindsided by her name being thrown into it all. The first thing she knew about it was when she woke up on Thursday morning and her name was just everywhere. It was crazy.'
Pictured here for the first time since the news Ford had named her as a witness, Keyser showed the strain of being catapulted into this political maelstrom.
...

The family member who asked not to be named explained: 'She's just trying to get through it and hoping for it all to die down.

'It really felt a lot like Christine was the one called to the principal's office to give an account of something and just threw her under the bus. You know, just reached for a name.'

...

Speaking in her defense Keyser's loved one noted: 'I think it's quite convenient that she named the person who is frankly probably the least physically capable of all of them to stand up and be subjected to questioning or give her account.'


Ford's testimony about her "friend."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yF9X3NqcgE

In her testimony, Blasey casually insinuated a falsehood, that her friend was having brain problems, while pretending to be only concerned about her "health challenges." She could have said something like, "Well, she's having back and neck problems. Maybe she's tired from that and her memory isn't sharp." Which would be a honest admission of the message she was trying to pump out. Instead, she implied it sneakily. Pretending to be oh-so-innocently worrying about her friend's health while sticking the "Leland is too brain-damaged to remember" dagger in her back.

That's not a strong indicator that she is honest about other things. Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, as DaNang Dick said. Or, "if you say 7 or 8 things that are very likely but not quite certain to be lies, it's essentially certain that at least one of them is a lie," as Nate Silver likes to put it.

And then after all this, Ford has her FBI agent muscle, McLean, lean on her. "Right-wing Republican rape apologists are using you to destroy your old friend. But no pressure, no pressure."


WD, quote exactly where Ford insinuated Leland had "brain problems." Here's the transcript of your clip:

MITCHELL: OK. Do you have any particular motives to ascribe to Leland?

FORD: I guess we could take those one at a time. Leland has significant health challenges, and I’m happy that she’s focusing on herself and getting the health treatment that she needs, and she let me know that she needed her lawyer to take care of this for her, and she texted me right afterward with an apology and good wishes, and et cetera, So I’m glad that she’s taking care of herself.

I don’t expect that P.J. and Leland would remember this evening. It was a very unremarkable party. It was not one of their more notorious parties, because nothing remarkable happened to them that evening. They were downstairs.


This is just another one of your puppy turds.
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Maksutov
_Emeritus
Posts: 12480
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 8:19 pm

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Maksutov »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Water Dog, quote exactly where Ford insinuated Leland had "brain problems." Here's the transcript of your clip:

MITCHELL: OK. Do you have any particular motives to ascribe to Leland?

FORD: I guess we could take those one at a time. Leland has significant health challenges, and I’m happy that she’s focusing on herself and getting the health treatment that she needs, and she let me know that she needed her lawyer to take care of this for her, and she texted me right afterward with an apology and good wishes, and et cetera, So I’m glad that she’s taking care of herself.

I don’t expect that P.J. and Leland would remember this evening. It was a very unremarkable party. It was not one of their more notorious parties, because nothing remarkable happened to them that evening. They were downstairs.


This is just another one of your puppy turds.


You expect the Dog to READ? When he can listen to Rush or Hannity or watch Youtubes? What are you, some kind of a psycho? :lol:
"God" is the original deus ex machina. --Maksutov
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Res Ipsa »

WD's conspiracy theory is straight out of the Alex Jones playbook. It starts out with WD treating as gospel truth the description of a conversation allegedly overheard by an ex-boyfriend who acknowledges that the relationship did not end well. It goes from there to Ford being some kind of mastermind who helped her friend cheat on her polygraph, so Ford must have cheated on her polygraph. Then he changes "beach friends" to "beach friend," conveniently ignoring Ford's testimony that she talked to several friends, all of which were giving her all sorts of advice. Then, because the friend that she helped owns property in the same town where Ford says she composed her letter, suddenly her friend become the master puppeteer behind all this. After all, she worked for *gasp* the FBJ. And worked in *gasp* the officer of Preet what's his face. And then, Washington D.C. lawyers are connected to all kinds of folks because *gasp* I'm losing track.

It's pathetic, fake moon landing grade conspiracy puppy turds. The scariest thing I've read all day was that WD was close to thinking I was "reasonable."
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Water Dog
_Emeritus
Posts: 1798
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:10 am

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Water Dog »

Image

This is funny, but actually not funny. Why would this woman be thinking these crazy things? Perhaps because someone has convinced her that there is a cover-up conspiracy afoot intentionally designed to place a rapist on the Supreme Court with machinations to corruptly influence the law to defend rapists, or something.
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Still waiting WD. Or are you just going to dash off and fetch new turds? Your "squirrel" routine ain't fooling anyone.

Now, where did Ford say anything about brain damage?
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Brackite
_Emeritus
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am

Re: Kavanaugh and Perjury

Post by _Brackite »

Water Dog wrote:He already has bad polls. How is this so difficult to understand? West Virginia is RED! If he votes No, he's for-sure done. If he votes Yes, maybe, just maybe, he can survive.


Senator Manchin is ahead in the polls, and he will likely get re-elected.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epoll ... -6258.html

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/20 ... -virginia/
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
Post Reply