subgenius wrote:Lets pretend you know at least diddly-squat about the US and then just remind you that the listed states are primarily agricultural and energy states and they offer a higher standard of living relative to housing costs and tax burdens.
In other words, a middle class American can more easily afford to own a house and a couple of cars in what seemingly are RED states as opposed to BLUE states (which is ultimately the clumsy and juvenile topic you are trying to approach here...some sort of backhanded insult that poorest states must somehow equal "stupid voter").
So maybe ask what the electoral implications are when a house in a BLUE market has average costs of over $200 sq.ft. while in a RED market it costs barely over $100 sq.ft.
Economics is not simply a measure of income you dolt - it also relates to consumption...and consumption inequality (and tax rates) is something BLUE minded people like yourself often ignore when measuring "poor-ness".
So, the REALITY is that RED states are actually "richer" if you take another measure instead of the narrow-minded flame-baiting measure that you are trying to allude to in your OP....geez.
I know you are an idiot barely worth responding to, I can't mock you any worse than nature already has, but this is some of the stupidest crap I have ever read AND I have an hour to kill in this lounge before heading back to the US so...Your insanely shallow understanding of economics, buying power, real wages, "consumption" (lol) and what drives the economies and various financial advantages of different states (as if whole states can be treated as one homogeneous unit) is so lacking that its no wonder you are a stay at home Costanza.
I guess its also just a coincidence that the list in the OP heavily overlaps with the list of the states with the highest percentage of people on food stamps? Must be all that extra consuming and buying power! What was it you were saying about income inequality in "blue states"?
https://www.hungerfreeamerica.org/blog/trump-voting-states-most-utilize-snap-food-stamps
My guess is you have no fooking idea what different measures of income inequality mean or how certain industries and urban centers actually affect the inequality statistics in states that also have a large rural population.
subgenius wrote:People aren't stupid as you would wish, they are just simple...big difference.
Or, as in your case, it could just be both. Simple and stupid are not mutually exclusive. But hey:

ETA - This line definitely needed to be highlighted. "another measure" - lol.
subgenius wrote:So, the REALITY is that RED states are actually "richer" if you take another measure instead of the narrow-minded flame-baiting measure that you are trying to allude to in your OP.
That is pure gold straight from the mind of someone who has never left the holler they were raised in...