Goodbye Gemli. Thanks For the Laughs And Memories.

[Dr. Shades]

Will the church ever own up to their past?

What’s the point of asking a question to which you already know the answer?

[Everybody Wang Chung]

I see that Dr. Peterson mentioned “Scratch” amidst the various comments that he made. Well, Prof. P., whoever posted that wasn’t me. But you know what? There is a lesson to be learned here, provided that one isn’t too old to learn from one’s mistakes. Here’s the deal, Dan: You have spent close to two decades trying to exact revenge on me, and in the meantime, your flippant cruelty and your arrogant defense of the worst aspects of the Church have earned you literally *hundreds* of enemies. So, I don’t even have to lift a finger at this point: all your enemies know that all they have to do is get you to *think* I’m involved, and it will “inflame your passions.” You always used to accuse me of being obsessed, and look what became of that!

DCP is consumed with Dr. Scratch. I don’t think there is a waking hour he doesn’t think about Dr. Scratch at least 5 times. I’m sure thoughts of Dr. Scratch haunt him nightly in his dreams too.

I have a prediction for DCP. DCP’s last dying breath will be used to utter, “Scratchhhh.”

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O4mQqVqRB7I

[malkie]

Will the church ever own up to their past?

What’s the point of asking a question to which you already know the answer?

Rhetoric.

[Marcus]

…I don't like apologist dissembling and insinuating the lady is lying as part of their apologetic panoply, but I also do not like to see Dr. Peterson getting trounced.

So you don’t like the dissembling and insinuations of lying, but you also don’t like that people are noticing the dissembling and the insinuations of lying, and then are taking to task the exact person who is engaging in the dissembling and the insinuations of lying.

It’s not really a logical position to take, is it?

[malkie]

…I don't like apologist dissembling and insinuating the lady is lying as part of their apologetic panoply, but I also do not like to see Dr. Peterson getting trounced.

So you don’t like the dissembling and insinuations of lying, but you also don’t like that people are noticing the dissembling and the insinuations of lying, and then are taking to task the exact person who is engaging in the dissembling and the insinuations of lying.

It’s not really a logical position to take, is it?

Really, Marcus - you're expecting Moksha to be logical & consistent? These are not characteristics I would necessarily expect of our beloved penguin.

[Marcus]

So you don’t like the dissembling and insinuations of lying, but you also don’t like that people are noticing the dissembling and the insinuations of lying, and then are taking to task the exact person who is engaging in the dissembling and the insinuations of lying.

It’s not really a logical position to take, is it?

Really, Marcus - you're expecting Moksha to be logical & consistent? These are not characteristics I would necessarily expect of our beloved penguin.

[Moksha]

So you don’t like the dissembling and insinuations of lying, but you also don’t like that people are noticing the dissembling and the insinuations of lying, and then are taking to task the exact person who is engaging in the dissembling and the insinuations of lying.

It’s not really a logical position to take, is it?

I dislike any attempt to publically humiliate him. I know over the years he has been less than kind to people, for instance, Dr. Michael Quinn, but I do not want to see others being mean to him as a form of retribution. It violates my code of ethics, just the same as using apologetics to question the veracity of Ms. Channel Achenbach.

The pathetic quality of needing to deny the smell of discriminatory excrement seems to be punishment enough. When members of good conscience see it, they will say, "Quit lying for us".

[Marcus]

So you don’t like the dissembling and insinuations of lying, but you also don’t like that people are noticing the dissembling and the insinuations of lying, and then are taking to task the exact person who is engaging in the dissembling and the insinuations of lying.

It’s not really a logical position to take, is it?

I dislike any attempt to publically humiliate him. I know over the years he has been less than kind to people, for instance, Dr. Michael Quinn, but I do not want to see others being mean to him as a form of retribution. It violates my code of ethics, just the same as using apologetics to question the veracity of Ms. Channel Achenbach.

The pathetic quality of needing to deny the smell of discriminatory excrement seems to be punishment enough. When members of good conscience see it, they will say, "Quit lying for us".

Usually I let your non sequiturialness go, but this time, I must object.

You say

1) it “violates my code of ethics” to use “apologetics to question the veracity of Ms. Channel Achenbach.”

And

2) it “violates my code of ethics” to call to task a person who is using apologetics to question the veracity of Ms. Channel Achenbach.

In other words, you really just want rainbows and unicorns for everyone, right? no response necessary. I already know what you will say.

[Moksha]

Given our previous history, I refuse to interact with you.

[Marcus]

Given our previous history, I refuse to interact with you.

But of course you do. That’s why you “interacted” with me here:

So you don’t like the dissembling and insinuations of lying, but you also don’t like that people are noticing the dissembling and the insinuations of lying, and then are taking to task the exact person who is engaging in the dissembling and the insinuations of lying.

It’s not really a logical position to take, is it?

I dislike any attempt to publically humiliate him. I know over the years he has been less than kind to people, for instance, Dr. Michael Quinn, but I do not want to see others being mean to him as a form of retribution. It violates my code of ethics, just the same as using apologetics to question the veracity of Ms. Channel Achenbach.

The pathetic quality of needing to deny the smell of discriminatory excrement seems to be punishment enough. When members of good conscience see it, they will say, "Quit lying for us".

You can hardly object when I am responding back to your responses back to me.