So now that they’re off the hook, who or what are we blaming?MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:01 pmAlso, here are the formal charges that have been filed:
https://thehill.com/video-clips/5505987 ... t-charges/
It looks like Mitt Romney, Mike Lee, and Spencer Cox are innocent of any wrong doing.![]()
Regards,
MG
Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
- canpakes
- God
- Posts: 10539
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
I'm happy to educate you.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:06 pmWell, there is a new term I haven't heard before.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 5:29 pmI don’t think MG is a deliberate and conscious racist. I think he’s being thoughtlessly racist - casual racism.
Nope, that was my original observation - "Yes. Make no mistake, MaGa’s comment is racism. It may not have been conscious, but it is still racism." So you've not got me cutting anything back.At least I got you to 'cut back' a bit from your original accusation.
So you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?Thoughtlessly racist. Yeah, right. Sheesh.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
Cute. No cigar.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:21 pmSo you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?
Regards,
MG
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
Still no apology. Lurkers take note. That's some good missionary work MaGa 2.0MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:25 pmCute. No cigar.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:21 pmSo you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?
Regards,
MG
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
There has been much said on this in the last few days, so I don't know that it necessarily bears repeating. What I'd be interested in is the take of progressives/liberals. What caused Tyler Robinson to make such a sudden and clean break from his conservative family and their values? Simply teenage rebellion? That led to murder? What are your thoughts, canpakes? An anomaly?canpakes wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:17 pmSo now that they’re off the hook, who or what are we blaming?MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:01 pmAlso, here are the formal charges that have been filed:
https://thehill.com/video-clips/5505987 ... t-charges/
It looks like Mitt Romney, Mike Lee, and Spencer Cox are innocent of any wrong doing.![]()
Regards,
MG
Regards,
MG
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
Lurkers, go back and read all my posts. No need for an apology for a wrong I didn't commit. IHQ, likes to set up those he doesn't agree with for a 'fall'. Although he isn't great at it. But he tries hard!I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:28 pmStill no apology. Lurkers take note. That's some good missionary work MaGa 2.0
That's his M.O.
Regards,
MG
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
Anything to say specifically to those lurking with a Native American heritage?MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:31 pmLurkers, go back and read all my posts. No need for an apology for a wrong I didn't commit. IHQ, likes to set up those he doesn't agree with for a 'fall'. Although he isn't great at it. But he tries hard!I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:28 pmStill no apology. Lurkers take note. That's some good missionary work MaGa 2.0
That's his M.O.
Regards,
MG
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
IHQ, what are your thoughts in regard to the questions I'm proposing that canpakes to respond to?
Regards,
MG
Regards,
MG
-
MG 2.0
- God
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
I hope you're having a wonderful day!I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:33 pmAnything to say specifically to those lurking with a Native American heritage?
Regards,
MG
-
Marcus
- God
- Posts: 8039
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm
Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?
My vote is for thoughtfully, but yes, I agree definitely racist.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:21 pmI'm happy to educate you.Nope, that was my original observation - "Yes. Make no mistake, MaGa’s comment is racism. It may not have been conscious, but it is still racism." So you've not got me cutting anything back.At least I got you to 'cut back' a bit from your original accusation.So you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?Thoughtlessly racist. Yeah, right. Sheesh.