Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10539
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by canpakes »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:01 pm
Also, here are the formal charges that have been filed:

https://thehill.com/video-clips/5505987 ... t-charges/

It looks like Mitt Romney, Mike Lee, and Spencer Cox are innocent of any wrong doing. ;)

Regards,
MG
So now that they’re off the hook, who or what are we blaming?
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4268
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:06 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 5:29 pm
I don’t think MG is a deliberate and conscious racist. I think he’s being thoughtlessly racist - casual racism.
Well, there is a new term I haven't heard before.
I'm happy to educate you.
At least I got you to 'cut back' a bit from your original accusation.
Nope, that was my original observation - "Yes. Make no mistake, MaGa’s comment is racism. It may not have been conscious, but it is still racism." So you've not got me cutting anything back.
Thoughtlessly racist. Yeah, right. Sheesh.
So you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:21 pm
So you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?
Cute. No cigar.

Regards,
MG
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4268
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:25 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:21 pm
So you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?
Cute. No cigar.

Regards,
MG
Still no apology. Lurkers take note. That's some good missionary work MaGa 2.0
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by MG 2.0 »

canpakes wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:17 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:01 pm
Also, here are the formal charges that have been filed:

https://thehill.com/video-clips/5505987 ... t-charges/

It looks like Mitt Romney, Mike Lee, and Spencer Cox are innocent of any wrong doing. ;)

Regards,
MG
So now that they’re off the hook, who or what are we blaming?
There has been much said on this in the last few days, so I don't know that it necessarily bears repeating. What I'd be interested in is the take of progressives/liberals. What caused Tyler Robinson to make such a sudden and clean break from his conservative family and their values? Simply teenage rebellion? That led to murder? What are your thoughts, canpakes? An anomaly?

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:28 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:25 pm


Cute. No cigar.

Regards,
MG
Still no apology. Lurkers take note. That's some good missionary work MaGa 2.0
Lurkers, go back and read all my posts. No need for an apology for a wrong I didn't commit. IHQ, likes to set up those he doesn't agree with for a 'fall'. Although he isn't great at it. But he tries hard!

That's his M.O.

Regards,
MG
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4268
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by I Have Questions »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:31 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:28 pm
Still no apology. Lurkers take note. That's some good missionary work MaGa 2.0
Lurkers, go back and read all my posts. No need for an apology for a wrong I didn't commit. IHQ, likes to set up those he doesn't agree with for a 'fall'. Although he isn't great at it. But he tries hard!

That's his M.O.

Regards,
MG
Anything to say specifically to those lurking with a Native American heritage?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by MG 2.0 »

IHQ, what are your thoughts in regard to the questions I'm proposing that canpakes to respond to?

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:33 pm
Anything to say specifically to those lurking with a Native American heritage?
I hope you're having a wonderful day! :D

Regards,
MG
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Patheos: Were Mitt Romney, Mike Lee and Spencer Cox Behind The Charlie Kirk Shooting?

Post by Marcus »

I Have Questions wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:21 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 9:06 pm


Well, there is a new term I haven't heard before.
I'm happy to educate you.
At least I got you to 'cut back' a bit from your original accusation.
Nope, that was my original observation - "Yes. Make no mistake, MaGa’s comment is racism. It may not have been conscious, but it is still racism." So you've not got me cutting anything back.
Thoughtlessly racist. Yeah, right. Sheesh.
So you're now saying you were being thoughtfully racist? That it was deliberate?
My vote is for thoughtfully, but yes, I agree definitely racist.
Post Reply