Detransitioners vs the Progressive Machine: A Legal and Cultural Time Bomb

[Whiskey]

You’re lying again, and it’s the same lazy pattern. I never changed my claim. I said exactly what you did, alleged support for a crime, and you’ve been trying to rewrite that ever since.

You invent a false version of what was said, argue against your own invention, then pretend you “won.” It’s a toddler move dressed up as moderation. You’re not correcting anything; you’re covering for yourself.

The only bad faith here is yours, constant deflection, the smug little jabs, and the fake authority you wrap around lies. This isn’t about blood pressure. It’s about you getting caught fabricating again and trying to smirk your way out of it.

You can lie. Your lies about posters are where you cross the line as a moderator, liar.

Binger, that bulging neck vein looks bad. You have health care coverage, right?

Nothing has changed, and nothing will. I’m the outlier here, and most will line up to praise your lies and blow smoke up your ass. I get that.

But none of it makes your lies factual.

You lied about what was said. You lied about who said it. You lied about what it meant. Then you hid behind the same tired routine of mockery and misdirection to cover it up. That is not conversation. It is manipulation.

So keep your little circle of applause. Keep the smug jokes and the safety of the edit button. None of it changes the record, and the record shows exactly what you are.

[canpakes]

You're a liar!

I asked AI if my OP suggested i believe there should be an absolute and total ban on gender affirming care, as you suggest I believe, and once again AI proves you to be a lying idiot!

I posted an image on the AI thread to show you what AI thinks about your lying tendencies.

You should correct me, then. Otherwise it can be reasonably concluded that you prefer ‘an absolute and total ban on gender affirming care’ for minors, given your first couple of posts.

It’s a simple question.

Hound, how’s this coming along? Have you figured out your position, yet?

[Whiskey]

How dare Canpakes suggest that someone who proudly enables a felon pedophile rapist supports crime. I'm offended!

Spare me the sarcasm, Molok. You’re not observing. You’re endorsing. When you mock the callout, you’re siding with the lie.

We are not looking for polite gaslighting. We are looking for accountability. If you want to be outraged, be outraged at the liess, not at the people who point them out.

You’re applauding deceit because it fits your side of the board politics. That isn’t wit. It’s cowardice. You’re cheering for the referee who trips players mid-game, then pretends it’s part of the sport.

What you’re defending isn’t clever moderation. It’s corrosion of trust. Every time you laugh it off, you make the place smaller, dumber, and more dishonest. Can you handle differences or disagreement? If not, own it. If so, contribute to the conversation.

[Hound of Heaven]

This is Katie Anderson; she has detransitioned, and her story is truly remarkable. It's definitely worth a listen.

We are currently on page 12 of this discussion, and Can'tpakes and Captain Progressive have not yet provided an explanation for why children should undergo breast removal in an effort to improve their self-esteem.

Let's recall that on the first page of this discussion, Canpakes and Captain Progressive are questioned about the distinction between right-wing Mormons at BYU who try to intimidate homosexuals into becoming heterosexuals by making them watch pornography while shocking them, and on the other far end Marxist progressives like themselves who support medical procedures that mutilate the bodies of children in an effort to change their gender identity from what they were assigned at birth! No response received so far!

Perhaps either Can'tpakes or Captain Progressive will provide us with an answer by page 20 of this thread.

Let's pose the question once more to determine if Can'tpakes or Captain Progressive, also known as Res Ipsa, can provide an answer. Can either Can'tpakes or Captain Progressive clarify whether it is more harmful for right-wing Mormons to try to de-gay someone by subjecting them to porn while shocking them, or if it is worse for Marxist progressives to mutilate the bodies of children by removing breasts and penises?

https://youtu.be/KBkVhqgRz6U?si=k1cEJgRyeo59Xf_G

[canpakes]

How dare Canpakes suggest that someone who proudly enables a felon pedophile rapist supports crime. I'm offended!

Spare me the sarcasm, Molok. You’re not observing. You’re endorsing. When you mock the callout, you’re siding with the lie.

We are not looking for polite gaslighting. We are looking for accountability. If you want to be outraged, be outraged at the liess, not at the people who point them out.

You’re applauding deceit because it fits your side of the board politics. That isn’t wit. It’s cowardice. You’re cheering for the referee who trips players mid-game, then pretends it’s part of the sport.

What you’re defending isn’t clever moderation. It’s corrosion of trust. Every time you laugh it off, you make the place smaller, dumber, and more dishonest. Can you handle differences or disagreement? If not, own it. If so, contribute to the conversation.

So sayeth AI.

Here’s your links again. You lied and had to walk back your statement.

Now you derail the thread by accusing not one but two posters of crimes. …

…3. Where is the accusation of a crime? Point it out with a quote. …

You did not accuse anyone of a crime. You suggested they support a crime. Those are different claims.

There’s your error and your walkback when called on it. Follow the links.

[Whiskey]

Spare me the sarcasm, Molok. You’re not observing. You’re endorsing. When you mock the callout, you’re siding with the lie.

We are not looking for polite gaslighting. We are looking for accountability. If you want to be outraged, be outraged at the liess, not at the people who point them out.

You’re applauding deceit because it fits your side of the board politics. That isn’t wit. It’s cowardice. You’re cheering for the referee who trips players mid-game, then pretends it’s part of the sport.

What you’re defending isn’t clever moderation. It’s corrosion of trust. Every time you laugh it off, you make the place smaller, dumber, and more dishonest. Can you handle differences or disagreement? If not, own it. If so, contribute to the conversation.

So sayeth AI.

You underestimate me. As usual.

[canpakes]

This is Katie Anderson; …

Katie is probably wondering - like the rest of us - if you prefer an absolute and total ban on gender affirming care for minors.

Everyone else here has answered the question. Cat got your tongue? ; )

[Molok]

Spare me the sarcasm, Molok.

What sarcasm? You do proudly enable a felon pedophile rapist. This pearl clutching isn't working on anyone, dummy. Every word you said in the rest of the post was a stupid lie, so I deleted it.

[Hound of Heaven]

Cat got your tongue

Do Marxist progressives such as yourself and Captain Progressive believe it's ok to chop of tongues the same way you believe children should have their breast or penises chopped off?

[Whiskey]

This is Katie Anderson; …

Katie is probably wondering - like the rest of us - if you prefer an absolute and total ban on gender affirming care for minors.

Everyone else here has answered the question. Cat got your tongue? ; )

If genitals and breasts don’t define gender, why does removing genitals and breasts affirm it?