Kaysville, UT homeowners show up in large numbers to oppose warming center

[Gadianton]

No, I am saying they (according to your version of Jesus) would kill the dog. Not just leave it there. Kristi didn't take her dog to a shelter, she killed it directly, which is even better for conservatives because it didn't cost any tax money for shelter first. If this is the true Jesus, then yes I misunderstand the Bible and the Book of Mormon, and it's a problem for my argument.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

According to conservatives today, kill it. I mean, what if it escapes and bites a kid? Didn't Kristi Noem set the Christian example with Cricket as people like you believe in it? We can't have it wasting resources that could be used on lift kits and American flags for trucks. Your guy, Brian Kilmeade (something about his name) on Fox News suggested homeless people should be killed by involuntary lethal injection. If the residents of Kaysville were to learn that the warming center was a front for a human kill shelter, would they have protested, or would they have pretended they didn't know about it? Just like the Germans under Hitler pretended they were surprised about what was going on with the concentration camps?

So, are you saying Kristi and Jesus would leave the dog in the shelter to be killed?

This is problematic for your argument, no?

SO ARE YOU SAYING??? *instantly says something retarded*

[canpakes]

Still not sure though, WWJD if a pit bull was in a kill shelter?

He could put it in a basket with some loaves, and use it to feed the unwashed masses of the homeless. It will be a modern-day miracle, taking care of two problems at once, and would fit this moment in history perfectly.

[canpakes]

No, I am saying they (according to your version of Jesus) would kill the dog.

With what Kristi did to an exciteable but friendly dog, imagine how she’d treat one that gnawed on one of her children’s face.

[Limnor]

How the Kaysville issue would be resolved if initial practices were adhered to in the modern day:

On the Road to the Tombs

(Revealed to the living prophet as an appendix to the Joseph Smith Jr Inspired Version of the King James Bible, given on December 22nd 2025 in Salt Lake City, Utah, responding to a question about how charity should be administered)

Mark 5:6 As they approached the possessed man, one of the disciples was heard whispering, “People are going to have their own opinions on things, Jesus.”

7 “Even including how to deal with demon-possessed men living among tombs. Yea, the teachings say we should love our enemies, but maybe we should soften that to loving our brother and sister. I mean, on the ground, there are complications,” and the disciple further asserted, “I’m saying this as a believer.”

8 He continued, “You know, Lord, people worry about their kids. They worry about crime. They, and by they I mean the men-folk, want their women to be safe and protected from the dangers of, well, legion-related incidents. They’re concerned about the neighborhood. Property values and stuff.”

9 He paused, hoping the point was hitting home. “I’m not saying don’t help. I’m just saying that while compassion is an admirable trait, direct engagement could be misinterpreted as endorsement. Perhaps a strongly worded parable? Or ministering from a safe distance. Or at least a brief assessment of whose tombs these actually are.”

10 “Thanks,” said Jesus.

11 And it was proposed that assistance be rendered in an orderly manner consistent with community bylines, and after counsel was taken, it was determined that the matter would be referred to appropriate local authorities, and that further action would be deferred until such a time as consensus could be reached.

12 And the Savior went His way, and the man remained among the tombs.

[canpakes]

So, are you saying Kristi and Jesus would leave the dog in the shelter to be killed?

This is problematic for your argument, no?

SO ARE YOU SAYING??? *instantly says something retarded*

The imaginings are strong with that one.

[Whiskey]

No, I am saying they (according to your version of Jesus) would kill the dog. Not just leave it there. Kristi didn't take her dog to a shelter, she killed it directly, which is even better for conservatives because it didn't cost any tax money for shelter first. If this is the true Jesus, then yes I misunderstand the Bible and the Book of Mormon, and it's a problem for my argument.

Okay.

You think Jesus would kill the dog.

So, in this case, you would not do WWJD. Or would you kill the dog like a good disciple of Jesus?

The point here is that we decide WWJD, then we decide that we would do WWJD but the people we don't like would not do WWJD. Correct?

[I Have Questions]

That sounded better in your head, right?

IHAQ, don't write about me. Write about the content. The field of authors writing about me is crowded with ditships. Don't be a ditship.

It still sounds great because it is exactly what is going on here. A rambling run on of backslapping and congratulations for knowing WWJD and pointing fingers at other people.

I’m trying to fill the vacuum where your content contribution should be. All I’m seeing is your anger issues being splattered across the board in what looks like a desperate cry for attention.

[canpakes]

IHAQ, don't write about me. Write about the content. The field of authors writing about me is crowded with ditships. Don't be a ditship.

It still sounds great because it is exactly what is going on here. A rambling run on of backslapping and congratulations for knowing WWJD and pointing fingers at other people.

I’m trying to fill the vacuum where your content contribution should be. All I’m seeing is your anger issues being splattered across the board in what looks like a desperate cry for attention.

On a possibly positive note, he has given a great reason here to disband Bible study groups and Christianity itself, because no one can ever know or conclude what Jesus said or thought, or what Christianity stands for.

All hail the delegitimization of Christianity, and the tossing of a whole crapload of bigoted opinions supposedly propped up by it, right?

[Whiskey]

IHAQ, don't write about me. Write about the content. The field of authors writing about me is crowded with ditships. Don't be a ditship.

It still sounds great because it is exactly what is going on here. A rambling run on of backslapping and congratulations for knowing WWJD and pointing fingers at other people.

I’m trying to fill the vacuum where your content contribution should be. All I’m seeing is your anger issues being splattered across the board in what looks like a desperate cry for attention.

Let me help you. I am not angry. Not even a little bit. If that is what you are seeing, ask yourself why. Don't take the bait and believe the ditships saying I am angry. I doubt you can point to a single post that suggests anger. Not one.