The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Limnor
God
Posts: 1777
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2023 12:55 am

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by Limnor »

Marcus wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 4:04 am
Limnor wrote:
Tue Sep 15, 2026 11:55 pm
What makes this whole thing funny and entertaining, from my neverMo perspective, is that Peterson often writes from a seemingly lofty place, so when Gad or somebody else successfully gets under his skin, it punctures that image a little. I’m actually surprised he gets so visibly irritated by internet hecklers. You’d think responding would feel like punching below his weight. The added entertainment value is “The Before/Nolan” pretending to be a mediator while not especially subtle about what he’s doing.

External commentary complete.
Exhibit 22 of the commentary. From “The Before/Nolan” :
...I figured he had done something horrible to several members here in the past, like ate their pets or something. Or maybe it's penisneid. It’s none of my business, but either way, a simple phone call could solve this whole thing.
Right. Everyone just needs to understand that whatever Peterson did probably wasn’t that bad. At least not “he ate your pets” bad, for goodness’ sake. The entirety of this board simply needs to repent and just call him and allow him the opportunity to forgive them. I can’t imagine why this is so difficult.
User avatar
Hound of Heaven
God
Posts: 1219
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by Hound of Heaven »

The Before wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2026 10:49 pm
Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2026 12:26 pm
Maybe you haven't figured this out yet, but the particular exmormons that post to this board view Daniel Peterson as Satan himself. 25% of the post on this forum are about him. I have tried and I am still trying to figure it out, but not one board member here has given me a good explanation as to why they obsess over
I noticed an overrepresentation of posts and comments concerning Dan Peterson, The Afore, The Proprietor, etc., but I figured he had done something horrible to several members here in the past, like ate their pets or something. Or maybe it's penisneid. It’s none of my business, but either way, a simple phone call could solve this whole thing.
What you gotta understand about this place is that the progressive board members are here to reduce their stress level by insulting people especially anyone that is Mormon or supports Mormonism or just doesn't agree with their unhealthy disdain of Mormonism.

In the past week I've had two threads in Spirit Paradise dedicated to me, board members asking me questions, wanting a response, while at the same time telling me I'm on their ignore list. If you look back through the pages of this forum and take a look at how many threads are started about MG2.0 who is a devout Mormon, you'll start see a pattern of exmormons starting threads about individual board members with whom they disagree with! :lol: They start threads about Peterson, me, MG2.0, Ajax, Whiskey, Ceeboo because when they sign on to the board for the day, their mental well being from being an exmormon that hasn't dealt with internal trauma, is at, let's say a 9 on a scale from 1 to 10. And starting threads about me or Peterson, especially Peterson who these long time board members have literally made him their personal Satan, well, it reduces their angst and stress level down to let's say a 7 or so. So what you're watching as they post, is them in a free online therapy session letting go of stress by putting it on other people.

Now, get this, just so you know, there's a really good chance this post will be removed to a megathread that was started yesterday by the moderators that is dedicated to post like this, ones where I'm giving my opinion and because it hurts the exmormons on this board, you know, the ones that desire an echo chamber, they remove my post and put them in a megathread in Spirit Paradise!

You see, in their minds, they can insult me, Peterson, MG2.0 and others but I can't insult them back because I'm not part of the progressive exmormon cult club that comes here for "stress relief."

Take this thread for instance. It's one of thousands about Peterson! :lol: The poor guy can't say anything these bitter exmormons aren't willing to pick apart. They're like vultures on a carcass when it comes to Peterson. Take a look at the first post after the opening post! :lol: it's GadiSCAMton posing a "serious" question for Peterson! :lol: :lol: That's not a serious question! That's GadiSCAMton's hatred for Peterson being written down for all of us to read. I'm not kidding when I say these people have literally made Peterson their personal Satan! This thread is because Peterson apparently lost sleep over someone drinking a latte so a board member responded :lol:

Peterson can't do anything correct according to the exmormons here. And if he did they would still bash him over it because he is their personal Satan!
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4319
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by I Have Questions »

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 11:50 am
What you gotta understand about this place is that the progressive board members are here to reduce their stress level by insulting people…
Every accusation a confession.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Equality
Priest
Posts: 311
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:41 pm

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by Equality »

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 11:50 am
The Before wrote:
Sat Sep 19, 2026 10:49 pm
I noticed an overrepresentation of posts and comments concerning Dan Peterson, The Afore, The Proprietor, etc., but I figured he had done something horrible to several members here in the past, like ate their pets or something. Or maybe it's penisneid. It’s none of my business, but either way, a simple phone call could solve this whole thing.
What you gotta understand about this place is that the progressive board members are here to reduce their stress level by insulting people especially anyone that is Mormon or supports Mormonism or just doesn't agree with their unhealthy disdain of Mormonism.

In the past week I've had two threads in Spirit Paradise dedicated to me, board members asking me questions, wanting a response, while at the same time telling me I'm on their ignore list. If you look back through the pages of this forum and take a look at how many threads are started about MG2.0 who is a devout Mormon, you'll start see a pattern of exmormons starting threads about individual board members with whom they disagree with! :lol: They start threads about Peterson, me, MG2.0, Ajax, Whiskey, Ceeboo because when they sign on to the board for the day, their mental well being from being an exmormon that hasn't dealt with internal trauma, is at, let's say a 9 on a scale from 1 to 10. And starting threads about me or Peterson, especially Peterson who these long time board members have literally made him their personal Satan, well, it reduces their angst and stress level down to let's say a 7 or so. So what you're watching as they post, is them in a free online therapy session letting go of stress by putting it on other people.

Now, get this, just so you know, there's a really good chance this post will be removed to a megathread that was started yesterday by the moderators that is dedicated to post like this, ones where I'm giving my opinion and because it hurts the exmormons on this board, you know, the ones that desire an echo chamber, they remove my post and put them in a megathread in Spirit Paradise!

You see, in their minds, they can insult me, Peterson, MG2.0 and others but I can't insult them back because I'm not part of the progressive exmormon cult club that comes here for "stress relief."

Take this thread for instance. It's one of thousands about Peterson! :lol: The poor guy can't say anything these bitter exmormons aren't willing to pick apart. They're like vultures on a carcass when it comes to Peterson. Take a look at the first post after the opening post! :lol: it's GadiSCAMton posing a "serious" question for Peterson! :lol: :lol: That's not a serious question! That's GadiSCAMton's hatred for Peterson being written down for all of us to read. I'm not kidding when I say these people have literally made Peterson their personal Satan! This thread is because Peterson apparently lost sleep over someone drinking a latte so a board member responded :lol:

Peterson can't do anything correct according to the exmormons here. And if he did they would still bash him over it because he is their personal Satan!
Image
"Praise be to Allah"--President Donald J. Trump
"I love the inflation"--President Donald J. Trump
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 6812
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by Gadianton »

If you look back through the pages of this forum and take a look at how many threads are started about MG2.0 who is a devout Mormon, you'll start see a pattern of exmormons starting threads about individual board members with whom they disagree with! :lol: They start threads about Peterson, me, MG2.0, Ajax, Whiskey, Ceeboo
People do commonly start threads about Peterson -- generally they are starting threads responding to what Peterson discusses on on his blog. And often he brings up things he reads here. People rarely start threads about any of the others, you're just making that part up, as you well know.

However, it is quite common for you, Whiskey, and Ceeboo to start threads about this board or people on this board devoid of any arguments or questions and just lobbing insults.
"...gain control of land that FARMS owned..." -- Bill Hamblin
"Why did FARMS own land to begin with?" -- Me
User avatar
Hound of Heaven
God
Posts: 1219
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by Hound of Heaven »

Gadianton wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 2:55 pm
If you look back through the pages of this forum and take a look at how many threads are started about MG2.0 who is a devout Mormon, you'll start see a pattern of exmormons starting threads about individual board members with whom they disagree with! :lol: They start threads about Peterson, me, MG2.0, Ajax, Whiskey, Ceeboo
People do commonly start threads about Peterson -- generally they are starting threads responding to what Peterson discusses on on his blog. And often he brings up things he reads here. People rarely start threads about any of the others, you're just making that part up, as you well know.

However, it is quite common for you, Whiskey, and Ceeboo to start threads about this board or people on this board devoid of any arguments or questions and just lobbing insults.
Typical of you! My insults bad bad, but DrCamnPP or Bishop Schmo insults are A OK!! :lol: :lol:


You and a handful of other board members literally obsess over Peterson. Of course he reads this board!! This forum is basically dedicated to talking about him!

Do you have a forum on a discussion board dedicated to every little action or response you take part in on a daily basis? Probably not! But he does! Take this thread. It's about a fxxxin latte he discussed ! :lol: :lol:

Peterson had an opinion about a latte apparently and someone started a thread! :lol:
Last edited by Hound of Heaven on Sun Sep 20, 2026 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
drumdude
God
Posts: 8101
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by drumdude »

Gadianton wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 2:55 pm
If you look back through the pages of this forum and take a look at how many threads are started about MG2.0 who is a devout Mormon, you'll start see a pattern of exmormons starting threads about individual board members with whom they disagree with! :lol: They start threads about Peterson, me, MG2.0, Ajax, Whiskey, Ceeboo
People do commonly start threads about Peterson -- generally they are starting threads responding to what Peterson discusses on on his blog. And often he brings up things he reads here. People rarely start threads about any of the others, you're just making that part up, as you well know.

However, it is quite common for you, Whiskey, and Ceeboo to start threads about this board or people on this board devoid of any arguments or questions and just lobbing insults.
Also interestingly they’re not even that interested in discussing Daniel Peterson or Mormonism.

They want their conservative values validated and to “own the libtards.” They’re obsessed with being warriors for their petty little culture war.

Maybe they’re dealing with some nervousness about how the midterms will end up…
Last edited by drumdude on Sun Sep 20, 2026 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gadianton
God
Posts: 6812
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by Gadianton »

If I recall correctly, Sledge/Nolan/?/?/The Before began posting here after either getting banned from Sic et Non, or taking his ball and going home, due to constant conflict with the conservative posters there as Sledge who is/was a liberal on-the-fence Mormon. With that option sealed off, he began trolling this board.
but either way, a simple phone call could solve this whole thing
Did he ever pick up the phone and call his fellow comment section participants at SeN to resolve their differences? All it would have taken is a single phone conversation and he could be posting away in the SeN comment section in harmony with his peers, having all political differences resolved. Why did he refuse to set the example?
"...gain control of land that FARMS owned..." -- Bill Hamblin
"Why did FARMS own land to begin with?" -- Me
User avatar
The Before
Sunbeam
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2026 2:11 am

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by The Before »

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 11:50 am
What you gotta understand about this place is that the progressive board members are here to reduce their stress level by insulting people especially anyone that is Mormon or supports Mormonism or just doesn't agree with their unhealthy disdain of Mormonism.
It’s interesting, but also none of my business I guess. I am only here because of a W.S. thread (he’s my lolcow), and curiosity got the best of me. People are free to set up message boards or post online about whatever they want within the law. Dan appears to be a public figure, at least locally or regionally, and that’s the life of a public figure.

If there were truly an issue, a phone call or a lunch meeting could solve it, but I don’t think there is. I think humans like to complain.
Just call me “The,” or “TB.”

Life never gives us what we want at the moment that we consider appropriate. Adventures do occur, but not punctually. - EMF
Marcus
God
Posts: 8072
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: The Rev. Kishkumen Comes Under Fire at "SeN"

Post by Marcus »

Limnor wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 10:14 am
Marcus wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 4:04 am
Exhibit 22 of the commentary. From “The Before/Nolan” :
Right. Everyone just needs to understand that whatever Peterson did probably wasn’t that bad. At least not “he ate your pets” bad, for goodness’ sake. The entirety of this board simply needs to repent and just call him and allow him the opportunity to forgive them. I can’t imagine why this is so difficult.
:D

Plus Exhibit 23, re "not 'he ate your pets' bad",
also from "Sledge/Nolan/?/?/The Before":
The Before wrote:
Sun Sep 20, 2026 3:48 pm
It’s interesting, but also none of my business I guess. I am only here because of a W.S. thread (he’s my lolcow)...
If there were truly an issue, a phone call or a lunch meeting could solve it, but I don’t think there is...
:D :D
Post Reply